PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7569745

Estimation of reference change limits using patient data.

Abstract

Two approaches for deriving reference change limits from patient data are described. In the direct method, hospital database information is used for the selection of appropriate reference groups. If database information is not sufficient or reliable enough, but still most of the source data can be considered as health-related, an indirect method can be applied in the calculation of rough estimates for reference change limits. A computer program developed by us, GraphROC for Windows, includes both methods for the estimation of change limits from patient data. Time between specimen collections should be included as one classifying factor in the selection of source data. When only one previous result is available for comparison, change limits based on the reference sample group form the only available guide for clinical interpretation. However, when several previous results are available and the within-subject variances for the considered analyte are known to be heterogeneous between individuals, the clinical interpretation should rather be based on application of time series analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V Kairisto, T Kouri, A Virtanen, E Uusipaikka, T Koivula, Näntö. 1995. Estimation of reference change limits using patient data.. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365519509088449

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue attenuation is a prominent cause of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging artifacts, which may result in reduced diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging. A method incorporating simultaneously acquired transmission data permits nonuniform attenuation correction and when incorporating scatter correction and resolution compensation may substantially reduce interpretive errors. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective multicenter trial was performed recruiting patients with angiographically documented coronary disease (n=96) and group of subjects with a low likelihood of disease (n=88). The uncorrected and attenuation/scatter corrected images were read independently, without knowledge of the patient's clinical data. The detection of >/=50% stenosis was similar using uncorrected perfusion data or with attenuation/scatter correction and resolution compensation (visual or visual plus quantitative analysis), 76% versus 75% versus 78%, respectively (P=NS). The normalcy rate, however, was significantly improved with this new methodology, using either the corrected images (86% vs 96%; P=0.011) or with the corrected data and quantitative analysis (86% vs 97%; P=0.007). The receiver operator characteristic curves were also found to be marginally but not significantly higher with attenuation/scatter correction than with tradition SPECT imaging. However, the ability to detect multivessel disease was reduced with attenuation/scatter correction. Regional differences were also noted, with reduced sensitivity but improved specificity for right coronary lesions using attenuation/scatter correction methodology. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter trial demonstrates the initial clinical results of a new SPECT perfusion imaging modality incorporating attenuation and scatter correction in conjunction with 99mTc sestamibi perfusion imaging. Significant improvements in the normalcy rate were noted without a decline in overall sensitivity but with a reduction in detection of extensive coronary disease.

Data Interpretation, Statistical