PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7569747

Finding the "natural" vector bases for multidimensional reference values.

Abstract

The concept of reference values can be extended to multidimensional results. A probability function describes the relative density of the observations in the multivariate space. When the density of a given point is measured relative to all other points, we get an estimate of the density rank of a given point. If the rank of a point is lower than 95 per cent of all points, the multidimensional result is outside the multidimensional reference range. The single-dimensional case is a special case of this general concept. Many observations are needed to define multidimensional distributions. However, less points are needed if the dimensionality of the data matrix is reduced by statistical methods such as principal component analysis (PCA). Also other vector bases than the orthogonal solution produced by PCA are possible, and all of them compress data equally well. So the choice must be based on other criteria than compression. We propose using a vector basis that consists of positive numbers. The positive vectors can be found by direct methods such as Alternating Regression (AR) or they can be modified from the results of the PCA. Positive vectors resemble the spectra that are familiar in chemistry and physics. They are a "natural" way to describe multidimensional results. It is easier to name the positive vectors than the purely statistical vectors of PCA. To obtain a unique positive solution, additional constraints besides positivity are needed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E J Karjalainen, U P Karjalainen. 1995. Finding the "natural" vector bases for multidimensional reference values.. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365519509088451

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Utility of follow-up tests for detecting recurrent disease in patients with malignant melanomas.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of follow-up tests for signaling recurrences in patients with intermediate- and high-risk malignant melanomas treated with curative intention. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: North Central Cancer Treatment Group. PATIENTS: A total of 261 patients with resected local (> or = 1.69 mm) and regional nodal malignant melanomas who were enrolled in a single prospective adjuvant trial were studied. All patients were scheduled to be followed up monthly for 2 months, then every 2 months for the first year, every 4 months the second year, every 6 months the next 3 years, and annually thereafter, with each visit consisting of a history, physical examination, complete blood cell count, blood chemistry panel, and a chest x-ray. RESULTS: Of the 145 evaluable patients who developed recurrent melanomas, 99 patients (68%) developed symptoms that signaled the diagnosis of recurrent disease. Physical examination of asymptomatic patients led to the diagnosis of recurrent disease in 37 patients (26%). The other nine patients (6%) with recurrent disease had abnormal chest x-rays. Laboratory results were never a sole indicator of recurrent disease. CONCLUSION: The majority of recurrences following resection of primary melanomas are discovered by history and/or physical examination despite the frequent use of other follow-up tests. The present data indicate that routine blood analyses and chest x-rays have limited value in the postoperative follow-up of patients with resected intermediate- and high-risk melanomas.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques