PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7570396

Placebo effect and randomized clinical trials.

Abstract

The achievement of optimal therapeutic results presupposes the use of appropriate treatment combined with maximal utilization of placebo effects. These aims may sometimes be difficult to satisfy in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The question thus arises whether there is a conflict between the goals of therapy and those of experimental research; and if so, to what extent, and how is it handled in practice by clinicians and researchers. Various ethical problems have been discussed in several reports connected with RCTs. But we have found no discussion concerning the conflict between obtaining informed consent and promoting optimal placebo effects. Information about RCTs can be given in various ways. Sometimes appropriate information about RCTs to patients involves non-optimal utilization of placebo effects. This gives rise to ethical and methodological problems, which are discussed in this article.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Elander, G Hermerén. 1995. Placebo effect and randomized clinical trials.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00998543

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Genetic diagnostics as a legislation project. Regulatory initiatives and main areas of regulation].

The legislation project of a law on genetic diagnostics appears to have come to a standstill; however, it should be taken up again. The national and international discussion underlines the need for regulation. This assessment is based on the dynamic developments in the field of biological and medical sciences and the resulting problems for medical practice, the healthcare system, commercial in terests and, not least, patients, volunteers and clients. The German legislators cannot only build on the preparatory work of political advisory institutions and commissions; besides current legislation in neighbouring countries, several regulatory drafts have been prepared in Germany, which provide important normative material for legislative work. However, these drafts also reflect the conflicts of interest and assessment arising from such a project. Legislation on genetic diagnostics is not only concerned with differing focal points of regulation and numerous questions of detail but also with decisions on fundamental normative orientations and principles of regulation.

Conflict of Interest↗