PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7570998

LTP--a structural model to explain the inconsistencies.

Abstract

One of the major controversies in neuroscience concerns whether the expression of long-term potentiation (LTP) is a pre- or postsynaptic phenomenon, with apparently contradictory data being the norm. The model that is outlined in this article combines anatomical and electrophysiological evidence to allow apparently contradictory data to be compatible. Development of LTP involves both influx of Ca2+ through NMDA receptors, and activation of another factor, perhaps the metabotropic glutamate receptor. These two processes might result, respectively, in the insertion of activation of additional postsynaptic receptors, and the growth of microfilaments that could split simple synapses into perforated synapses, consisting of multiple active zones. Whether the latter occurred, and at what rate, would be likely to depend on multiple factors, such as temperature, the metabolic state of the cell, buffering of Ca2+, and the concentration of factors such as nitric oxide. These subtle experimental variables would thus determine whether the dominant effect observed was pre- or postsynaptic.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F A Edwards. 1995. LTP--a structural model to explain the inconsistencies.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(95)80003-k

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Dynamical model of long-term synaptic plasticity.

Long-term synaptic plasticity leading to enhancement in synaptic efficacy (long-term potentiation, LTP) or decrease in synaptic efficacy (long-term depression, LTD) is widely regarded as underlying learning and memory in nervous systems. LTP and LTD at excitatory neuronal synapses are observed to be induced by precise timing of pre- and postsynaptic events. Modification of synaptic transmission in long-term plasticity is a complex process involving many pathways; for example, it is also known that both forms of synaptic plasticity can be induced by various time courses of Ca(2+) introduction into the postsynaptic cell. We present a phenomenological description of a two-component process for synaptic plasticity. Our dynamical model reproduces the spike time-dependent plasticity of excitatory synapses as a function of relative timing between pre- and postsynaptic events, as observed in recent experiments. The model accounts for LTP and LTD when the postsynaptic cell is voltage clamped and depolarized (LTP) or hyperpolarized (LTD) and no postsynaptic action potentials are evoked. We are also able to connect our model with the Bienenstock, Cooper, and Munro rule. We give model predictions for changes in synaptic strength when periodic spike trains of varying frequency and Poisson distributed spike trains with varying average frequency are presented pre- and postsynaptically. When the frequency of spike presentation exceeds approximately 30-40 Hz, only LTP is induced.

Long-Term Potentiation↗

Long-term potentiation and depression induced by a stochastic conditioning of a model synapse.

Protracted presynaptic activity can induce long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD) of the synaptic strength. However, virtually all the experiments testing how LTP and LTD depend on the conditioning input are carried out with trains of stimuli at constant frequencies, whereas neurons in vivo most likely experience a stochastic variation of interstimulus intervals. We used a computational model of synaptic transmission to test if and to what extent the stochastic fluctuations of an input signal could alter the probability to change the state of a synapse. We found that, even if the mean stimulation frequency was maintained constant, the probability to induce LTD and LTP could be a function of the temporal variation of the input activity. This mechanism, which depends only on the statistical properties of the input and not on the onset of additional biochemical mechanisms, is not usually considered in the experiments, but it could have an important role to determine the amount of LTP/LTD induction in vivo. In response to a change in the distribution of the interstimulus intervals, as measured by the coefficient of variation, a synapse could be easily adapted to inputs that might require immediate attention, with a shift of the input thresholds required to elicit LTD or LTP, which are restored to their initial conditions as soon as the input pattern returns to the original temporal distribution.

Long-Term Potentiation↗