PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7576775

Thyroid and parathyroid imaging.

Abstract

This article reviews the current roles of imaging in the diagnosis of thyroid and parathyroid disorders, with an emphasis on ultrasound evaluation. Imaging of the thyroid and parathyroid can be performed with nuclear medicine, ultrasound, CT, and MRI. Indications for thyroid and parathyroid imaging studies have recently changed. The availability of experienced endocrine surgeons, as well as the development of accurate laboratory tests, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy, and high-resolution ultrasound, have dramatically influenced the evaluation of thyroid and parathyroid disease. In patients with thyroid nodular disease, a clinical examination by an experienced clinician with appropriate lab values and palpation-guided FNA is the current diagnostic protocol of choice. Ultrasound evaluation of high-risk patients and ultrasound-guided FNA both augment this protocol when necessary. In patients with diffuse thyroid glandular disease, radionuclide imaging and color Doppler sonography both can be used for evaluation. When preoperative imaging is clinically necessary, sonography or scintigraphy can be used for parathyroid adenoma localization in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. The recent development of technetium-99m sestamibi as a parathyroid imaging agent has improved the sensitivity of scintigraphy for parathyroid adenoma localization. Ultrasound and radionuclide imaging have also become valuable imaging techniques for parathyroid localization in patients with recurrent or persistent hyperparathyroidism.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C R Hopkins, C C Reading. 1995. Thyroid and parathyroid imaging.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-2171(95)90033-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

HMGA proteins up-regulate CCNB2 gene in mouse and human pituitary adenomas.

The high mobility group As (HMGAs) belong to a family of nonhistone nuclear proteins that orchestrate the assembly of nucleoprotein complexes. Through a complex network of protein-DNA and protein-protein interaction, they play important roles in gene transcription, recombination, and chromatin structure. This protein family is involved, through different mechanisms, in both benign and malignant neoplasias. We have recently reported that transgenic mice carrying the Hmga1 or Hmga2 genes under transcriptional control of the cytomegalovirus promoter develop pituitary adenomas secreting prolactin and growth hormone. We have shown that the mechanism of the HMGA2-induced pituitary adenoma is based on the increased E2F1 activity. The expression profile of mouse normal pituitary glands and adenomas induced in HMGA transgenic mice revealed an increased expression of the ccnb2 gene, coding for the cyclin B2 protein, in the neoplastic tissues compared with the normal pituitary gland. Here, we show, by electrophoretic mobility shift assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation, a direct binding of HMGA proteins to the promoter of ccnb2 gene, whereas luciferase assays showed that HMGAs are able to up-regulate ccnb2 promoter activity. Finally, we report an increased CCNB2 expression in human pituitary adenomas of different histotypes that is directly correlated with HMGA1 and HMGA2 expression. Because cyclin B2 is involved in the regulation of the cell cycle, these results taken together indicate that HMGA-induced cyclin B2 overexpression gives an important contribution to experimental and human pituitary tumorigenesis.

Adenoma

Dietary fiber and the risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma in women.

BACKGROUND: A high intake of dietary fiber has been thought to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 88,757 women, who were 34 to 59 years old and had no history of cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, or familial polyposis, who completed a dietary questionnaire in 1980. During a 16-year follow-up period, 787 cases of colorectal cancer were documented. In addition, 1012 patients with adenomas of the distal colon and rectum were found among 27,530 participants who underwent endoscopy during the follow-up period. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, established risk factors, and total energy intake, we found no association between the intake of dietary fiber and the risk of colorectal cancer; the relative risk for the highest as compared with the lowest quintile group with respect to fiber intake was 0.95 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 1.25). No protective effect of dietary fiber was observed when we omitted, adjustment for total energy intake, when events during the first six years of follow-up were excluded, or when we excluded women who altered their fiber intake during the follow-up period. No significant association between fiber intake and the risk of colorectal adenoma was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the existence of an important protective effect of dietary fiber against colorectal cancer or adenoma.

Adenoma