PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7580713

Estimating sample sizes for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons.

M J Campbell·S A Julious·D G Altman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sample size calculations are now mandatory for many research protocols, but the ones useful in common situations are not all easily accessible. This paper outlines the ways of calculating sample sizes in two group studies for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes. Formulas and worked examples are given. Maximum power is usually achieved by having equal numbers in the two groups. However, this is not always possible and calculations for unequal group sizes are given.

Explore related subjects

Data Interpretation, StatisticalHumansSample SizeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Campbell, S A Julious, D G Altman. 1995-10-28. Estimating sample sizes for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1145

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1998

Intrahelical side chain interactions in alpha-helices: poor correlation between energetics and frequency.

Polypeptide sequences in proteins may increase their tendency to adopt helical conformations in several ways. One is the recruiting of amino acid residues with high helical propensity. Another is the appropriate distribution of residues along the helix to establish stabilising side chain interactions. The first strategy is known to be followed by natural proteins because amino acids with high helical propensity are more frequent in alpha-helices. If proteins also followed the second strategy, stabilising amino acid pairs should be more frequent than others. To test this possibility we compared empirical energies of side chain interactions in alpha-helices with statistical energies calculated from a data base of proteins with low homology. We find some correlation between the stability afforded by the pairs and their relative abundance in alpha-helices but the realisation of energetic preferences into statistical preferences is very low. This indicates that natural alpha-helices do not regularly use intrahelical side chain interactions to increase their stability.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗