PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7601528

New user interfaces.

Abstract

Usability of a computer-based information system has three components: user-friendliness, acceptance and user-competence. These are important considerations in human-computer interface designs. So far, visual/manual interface techniques have dominated data-capture activities in hospital settings. Despite the improvements made in these areas, usability issues still remain over the use of such I/O devices like the computer keyboard, touch-sensitive screens, light pen and bar codes. This paper will examine two of the newer user interfaces that have emerged in recent years which can potentially improve computer usability in the healthcare setting. These are voice and pen technologies. Speech as a medium for communicating with computers has several advantages. It gives users freedom of movement away from a computer terminal. It further allows users to enter or receive data while engaged in other activities. For example, a doctor can simultaneously examine a patient and record his findings using voice input. The use of pen technology also liberates the physician and other healthcare workers from the keyboard and monitor. It gives them mobility, facilitates eye contact with patients and most importantly, allows them to tap the newest of computer hardware and software technology with the oldest of communication tools--the pen. Healthcare facilities are beginning to explore the use of these two technologies to improve on user-acceptance and user-competence. Some examples of their successful applications will be given.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K C Lun. 1995. New user interfaces.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7101(94)01093-g

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Deciphering the physician note.

Objective information about legibility of physician handwriting is scant. This retrospective chart review compared handwritten general medicine clinic chart notes from internal medicine faculty and housestaff with their typed counterparts. The written counterparts took 11 seconds (46%) longer to read and 5 seconds (11%) longer to answer comprehension questions. The authors' comprehension measure (developed specifically for ambulatory clinic notes) was only slightly higher for typed notes. The legibility of physician handwriting is not as dismal as assumed; physicians can effectively communicate on paper.

Handwriting

[Physiology, psychology and pathology of writing and spelling--an overview].

Writing and spelling are conceived as concerted actions comprising cognitive planning, motor action and an expressive content. In literate societies the individual use of alphabetic systems is acquired immediately after speech as a "cultural technique". As such these systems demand specific cognitive and motor skills which have been analysed primarily on the basis of neurological and psychiatric syndromes. We distinguish primary developmental disturbances and secondarily acquired disturbances of writing and spelling, categorizing the latter into four essential disturbance areas: linguistic command, motor execution, automatism control and dynamic tonus regulation. The clinical significance of writing and spelling is not confined to its possible disturbances. In pathologically induced restrictions of cognitive functions or of social skills the fact is rather that the written language frequently contributes to the development of individual coping strategies. From the psychodynamic aspect, written communication is characterized principally by its proximity-regulating function.

Handwriting

Handwritten digit recognition using two-layer self-organizing maps.

In this paper, we present a two-layer self-organizing neural network based method for handwritten digit recognition. The network consists of a base layer self-organizing map and a set of corresponding maps in the second layer. The input patterns are partitioned into subspace in the first layer. Patterns in a subspace are led to the second layer and a corresponding map is built according to the first layer performance. In the classification process, each pattern searches for several closest nodes from the base map and then it is classified into a specified class by determining the nearest model of the corresponding maps in the second layer. The new method yielded higher accuracy and faster performance than the ordinary self-organizing neural network.

Handwriting