PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7606686

Peer consultation: a look at process.

B W Rich·B Hart·A Barrett·G Marks·S Ruderman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

After attending graduate nursing school, and being exposed to the concepts of peer supervision and consultation, six women formed a peer consultation group. A peer consultation group, simply stated, is a professional support group. In this article, evolution of the group process is described from personal experience and personal perspectives. The aim is to inspire other CNSs and nursing personnel involved in advanced practice to consider involvement in such a group to enhance their own professional growth and well-being. Although the format, group size, individual composition, and beneficial aspects of the group have varied throughout the 5-year tenure, group members unanimously agree that such a forum has been invaluable for their professional growth and development.

Explore related subjects

ConsultantsFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansNurse CliniciansPeer GroupPsychiatric NursingSocial SupportJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B W Rich, B Hart, A Barrett, G Marks, S Ruderman. 1995. Peer consultation: a look at process.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002800-199505000-00018

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

UK national survey of enucleation, evisceration and orbital implant trends.

AIM: To evaluate current clinical practice in the UK in the management of the anophthalmic socket; choice of enucleation, evisceration, type of orbital implant, wrap, motility pegging and complications. METHODS: All consultant ophthalmologists in the UK were surveyed by postal questionnaire. Questions included their practice subspecialty and number of enucleations and eviscerations performed in 2003. Specific questions addressed choice of implant, wrap, motility pegging and complications. RESULTS: 456/896 (51%) consultants responded, of which 162 (35%) had a specific interest in oculoplastics, lacrimal, orbits or oncology. Only 243/456 (53%) did enucleations or eviscerations. 92% inserted an orbital implant after primary enucleation, 69% after non-endophthalmitis evisceration, whereas only 43% did so after evisceration for endophthalmitis (50% as a delayed procedure). 55% used porous orbital implants (porous polyethylene, hydroxyapatite or alumina) as their first choice and 42% used acrylic. Most implants inserted were spherical, sized 18-20 mm in diameter. 57% wrapped the implant after enucleation, using salvaged autogenous sclera (20%), donor sclera (28%) and synthetic Vicryl or Mersilene mesh (42%). A minority (7%) placed motility pegs in selected cases, usually as a secondary procedure. 14% of respondents reported implant exposure for each type of procedure and extrusion was reported by 4% after enucleation and 3% after evisceration. CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights contemporary anophthalmic socket practice in the UK. Most surgeons use porous orbital implants with a synthetic wrap after enucleation and only few perform motility pegging.

Consultants↗