PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7613563

Bibliographic databases: help in preparing reference lists.

Abstract

Typing bibliography references is time consuming. It is also frustrating to have to retype references when you submit a manuscript to journals using different reference styles. Now you don't need to retype them. Computer programs have been developed which help you reorganize your references to many different styles. This experienced nurse author compares several of these programs for you.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Biancuzzo. 1995. Bibliographic databases: help in preparing reference lists.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7613563/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Analysis of information sources in the journal, Atencion Primaria].

OBJECTIVES: To contribute to improving the understanding of the information bases of Spanish scientific production in the primary care field; to aid international contacts and the diffusion of information among doctors in our country. DESIGN: A bibliometric analysis of the bibliographic references of the studies published in the journal Atención Primaria during 1991. A data base, managed by dBASE IV, was created. SETTING: The Unit of Documental Analysis and Bibliometry of the Institute of Documental and Historical Studies in Science (University of Valencia-CSIC). MATERIAL: 2,615 bibliographic references in 205 studies contained in volume 8 of Atención Primaria. MAIN RESULTS: References from journal articles (68%) and books (26%) predominated. There were a large number of references from Spanish publications (45%) as against Northamerican (27%) and British (15%). There were few references from other European countries or Latin America. Information was quickly out of date (4 year semiperiod; Price index 50%). High proportion of self-quotations from the journal. CONCLUSIONS: The major role of the journal Atención Primaria in communicating information in the primary care field was underlined. The small amount of information from Latin America and E.U. countries (except Great Britain) highlights the isolation of Spain from these countries, which can be explained by the limits of the primary care field itself. There was also little use of information to which access was more difficult for primary care doctors, such as doctoral theses, congress papers or reports. Moreover this is a field with a high percentage of recent literature and rapidly out-of-date information.

Bibliographies as Topic

Methodology citations and the quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics and gynecology.

OBJECTIVES: Randomized controlled trials offer the best chance for valid treatment comparisons, yet most trials are of poor quality. This may reflect a lack of awareness of the requirements for conducting and reporting this type of research. If so, then citation of methodology references might indicate knowledge of how to conduct these studies and vice versa. Our study tests the hypothesis that the methodologic quality of published trials is related to citation of methodology references. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a hand search of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Obstetrics and Gynecology to identify all randomized controlled trials published in 1990 and 1991 (N = 206). We reviewed the reference lists of all reports of randomized controlled trials and evaluated the adequacy of randomization methods by accepted criteria. RESULTS: Most reports (81.6%) cited no methodology text or article. Although lack of any methodology reference was not significantly related to failure to report an adequate random method of sequence generation, this was highly related (p < 0.001) to failure to report adequate allocation concealment. Scanning the reference list of reports took a mean of 16 seconds and identified most poorly done trials. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators who conduct randomized controlled trials should be thoroughly familiar with this type of research or should get expert help. Poorly done trials are wasteful and often misleading.

Bibliographies as Topic