PubMed · 7623883
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H S Nelson. 1995-08-24. Beta-adrenergic bronchodilators.. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199508243330807
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: A combination metered-dose inhaler aerosol containing ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate has been reported to be more effective than either of its components in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The dose of albuterol sulfate is equal in moles per liter to the dose of albuterol base used in the commercially available metered-dose inhalers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of the combination of ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate with a commonly prescribed albuterol metered-dose inhaler containing albuterol base alone. METHODS: Investigators at different sites performed a double-blind, 29-day trial involving 357 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Efficacy measurements were taken at 15, 30, and 60 minutes after treatment with study medication and then hourly up to 6 hours on days 1 and 29 of the trial. The primary end point was improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Clinical status was followed up and safety monitoring was also performed. RESULTS: The combination produced a significantly greater peak and mean improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second over albuterol base alone on both test days. Similar changes were seen with forced vital capacity. Evaluations of clinical status were better for patients receiving combination therapy, and some improvements were statistically significant. The overall incidence of adverse effects was similar in the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a combination of ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate is more effective at improving pulmonary function than albuterol base alone, with no potentiation of adverse effects.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We examined in mice the effect of chronic diazepam treatment on the sensitivity to isoflurane, and that of repeated isoflurane exposure on the sensitivity to diazepam. Mice were divided into four groups: group 1, treated with diazepam, 10 mg/kg i.p. twice daily; group 2, vehicle-treated controls; group 3, exposed to 3% isoflurane for 25 min twice daily; and group 4, untreated controls. After 14 days the effect of the treatment was assessed. Twenty-four hours after the last 10 mg/kg diazepam treatment, groups 1 and 2 received diazepam, 5 mg/kg i.p., and were subjected to the horizontal wire test (HWT). All control mice but only 10% of the diazepam-treated mice failed the HWT. Groups 1 and 2 were then exposed to increasing concentrations of isoflurane. Diazepam-treated mice (group 1) lost the HWT at 0.7+/-0.7%, compared with 0.6+/-0.1% in controls (group 2) (P<0.001); the ED50 was 0.75% vs. 0.65%. Group 1 mice lost the righting reflex at 0.94+/-0.07% isoflurane vs. 0.87+/-0.06% in group 2 (P<0.01); the ED50 was 0.93% vs. 0.82%. Recovery time was 175+/-161 s in group 1 vs. 343+/-275 s in group 2 (P<0.02). Twenty-four hours after the last of the repeated exposures to isoflurane, we examined the responses of groups 3 and 4 to increasing concentrations of isoflurane. Mice in group 3 lost the righting reflex at 1.0+/-0.06% isoflurane vs. 0.9+/-0.04% in controls (group 4) (P<0.001); the ED50 was 0.96% vs. 0.85%. Recovery time was 113+/-124 s vs. 208+/-126 s in groups 3 and 4 (P<0.09). Diazepam, 3 mg/kg i.p. administered to groups 3 and 4, caused loss of the HWT reflex in 33% of group 3 mice and in 82% of controls (group 4) (P<0.001). It appears that prolonged exposure to both diazepam and isoflurane caused reduced sensitivity to each drug separately, as well as to the other drug. This finding may strengthen the theory that inhalational anesthetics may act via the same mechanism as the benzodiazepines.