PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7647760

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Abstract

Nissen fundoplication is the procedure of choice for gastroesophageal reflux. In the operating room at St Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Nissen fundoplication has been taken to another level. Because of the increasing trend in laparoscopic surgery and the advanced instruments available, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication procedures are now performed on a routine basis. One advantage of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, as opposed to open Nissen fundoplication, is that the laparoscopic approach is far less invasive. It consists of five 11.5-mm incisions, whereas the open procedure involves a large midline incision. In addition, the overall hospital bill for the laparoscopic procedure can be less than that for an open one; for a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, the operating room bill is higher, but the hospital stay is shorter. Usually, the patient can go home the following day and resume daily tasks within days. With an open Nissen fundoplication, the hospital stay is about 3 to 5 days, and because of the large midline incision, a recovery time of 4 to 6 weeks is required. Not only can the patient resume daily activities sooner, but there is generally less pain associated with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, and the overall hospital bill is less because of the days spent in the hospital for postoperative recovery.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D A Alpers. 1995. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7647760/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernias and fundoplications: a critical analysis of the available literature.

BACKGROUND: Little grade A medical evidence exists to support the use of prosthetic material for hiatal closure. Therefore, the authors compiled and analyzed all the available literature to determine whether the use of prosthetic mesh in hiatoplasty for routine laparoscopic fundoplications (LF) or for the repair of large (>5 cm) paraesophageal hernias (PEH) would decrease recurrence. METHODS: A literature search was performed using an inclusive list of relevant search terms via Medline/PubMed to identify papers (n = 19) describing the use of prosthetic material to repair the crura of patients undergoing laparoscopic PEH reduction, LF, or both. RESULTS: Case series (n = 5), retrospective reviews (n = 6), and prospective randomized (n = 4) and nonrandomized (n = 4) trials were identified. Laparoscopic procedures (n = 1,368) were performed for PEH, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), hiatal hernia, or a combination of the three. Group A (n = 729) had primary suture repair of the crura, and group B (n = 639) had repair with either interposition of mesh to close the hiatus or onlay of prosthetic material after hiatal or crural closure. The use of mesh was associated with fewer recurrences than primary suture repair in both the LF and PEH groups. The mean follow-up period did not differ between the groups (20.7 months for group A vs. 19.2 months for group B). None of the papers cited any instance of prosthetic erosion into the gastrointestinal tract. CONCLUSIONS: The current data tend to support the use of prosthetic materials for hiatal repair in both routine LF and the repair of large PEHs. Longer and more stringent follow-up evaluation is necessary to delineate better the safety profile of mesh hiatoplasty. Future randomized trials are needed to confirm that mesh repair is superior to simple crural closure.

Fundoplication↗