PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7648759

Drug interactions with thrombolytic agents. Current perspectives.

Abstract

Thrombolytic agents are widely used for the treatment of acute thromboembolic diseases, especially acute myocardial infarction (AMI). These compounds include streptokinase, anistreplase, alteplase, urokinase and, although not commercially available yet, saruplase (prourokinase). The therapeutic window of these compounds is relatively small and subtherapeutic or toxic plasma concentrations may have serious clinical implications (insufficient thrombolysis, reocclusion and bleeding). Among the factors that affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of thrombolytic agents, comedication is especially relevant since these drug interactions are partly predictable and sometimes preventable. Based on knowledge of the pharmacology of thrombolytic agents and general mechanisms by which pharmacokinetic drug interactions occur, interactions with alteplase and saruplase are expected. The clearance of alteplase is dependent on hepatic blood flow (HBF), and scientific evidence is emerging that saruplase is also a high-clearance compound. Each pharmacological agent that alters HBF and is given concurrently with one of these agents can change the plasma concentrations of those thrombolytics. Although there are no published data confirming drug-induced changes in the metabolism of alteplase or saruplase by this mechanism in humans, indirect supportive evidence (clinical observations and animal experiments) is available. An overview is presented of the anticipated effects of compounds that are frequently coadministered with thrombolytic agents on the pharmacokinetics of the thrombolytics with high-clearance properties. Since the clearance of these thrombolytics may be strongly affected by hypoperfusion of the liver as a result of cardiogenic haemodynamic failure, the role of circulatory changes in potential drug-drug interactions is also discussed. Pharmacodynamic drug interactions are highly relevant in the treatment of acute thrombotic lesions and are still being evaluated to further optimise treatment strategies. As most of these treatments exist as combinations of thrombolytic, antithrombin and antiplatelet compounds, beneficial effects are partly offset by bleeding complications. Changes in the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of thrombolytic agents may have serious consequences. It becomes imperative for the practising physician to be aware of benefits and risks of interactions with thrombolytic agents and especially of the fact that the principal way by which the pharmacokinetics of alteplase and, presumably, saruplase can be affected is by drug- and/or haemodynamic failure-induced changes of HBF.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A de Boer, J M van Griensven. 1995. Drug interactions with thrombolytic agents. Current perspectives.. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199528040-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hospitalisations and emergency department visits due to drug-drug interactions: a literature review.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to evaluate the incidence of adverse patient outcomes due to drug-drug interactions (D-DIs), the type of drugs involved and the underlying reason. As a proxy for adverse patient outcomes, emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions and re-hospitalisations were assessed. METHODS: A literature search in the Medline and Embase database (1990-2006) was performed and references were tracked. An overall cumulative incidence was estimated by dividing the sum of the cases by the sum of the study populations. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were found assessing the relationship between D-DIs and ED-visits, hospitalisations or re-hospitalisations. The studies with a large study size showed low incidences and vice versa. D-DIs were held responsible for 0.054% of the ED-visits, 0.57% of the hospital admissions and 0.12% of the re-hospitalisations. In the elderly population, D-DIs were held responsible for 4.8% of the admissions. Drugs most often involved were NSAIDs and cardiovascular drugs. The reasons for admissions or ED-visits, which were most often found were GI-tract bleeding, hyper- or hypotension and cardiac rhythm disturbances. CONCLUSION: This review provides information on the overall incidence of D-DIs as a cause of adverse patient outcomes, although there is still uncertainty about the impact of D-DIs on adverse patient outcomes. Our results suggest that a limited number of drugs are involved in the majority of cases and that the number of reasons for admission as a consequence of D-DIs seems to be modest.

Drug Interactions↗

Drug-induced long QT and torsade de pointes: recent advances.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A wide array of drugs can cause marked QT prolongation with the associated risk of torsade de pointes. The large number of drugs with this potential, the correspondingly large number of patients exposed to such drugs, and the potentially fatal outcome make drug-induced long QT syndrome an important public health problem. This review focuses on mechanisms underlying QT prolongation and proarrhythmia, risk factors, including the role of genetic variants, and the unifying framework of reduced repolarization reserve. RECENT FINDINGS: While most drugs that prolong the QT block a specific potassium channel, novel mechanisms altering protein trafficking have been discovered. The progression to torsade de pointes may be less related to degree of QT prolongation than to drug effects on transmural dispersion or variability of repolarization. Our understanding of certain predisposing risk factors has been further refined. SUMMARY: Ongoing research continues to elucidate the mechanisms underlying drug-induced long QT syndrome. Importantly, studies are establishing improved predictors of risk for progression to torsade de pointes, in addition to the degree of QT prolongation, which is an imperfect predictor. Nonetheless, drug-induced long QT syndrome and torsade de pointes pose unique challenges for clinicians, researchers, drug-development programs, and regulatory agencies.

Drug Interactions↗