PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7649318

Postdate antenatal testing.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the effect on pregnancy outcome of a policy of very early commencement of postdate surveillance testing, and induction of labor at 42 weeks. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 2776 consecutive cephalic deliveries at 38-42 weeks of gestation. Management of the postdate pregnancies included twice-weekly antenatal testing beginning at 40 completed weeks and elective induction of labor at 42 completed weeks. Pregnancy outcome parameters were compared between the groups delivered at 38-40 weeks and at 41-42 weeks. RESULTS: There were 2138 pregnancies delivered at 38-40 weeks and 638 at 41-42 weeks. The latter group had a statistically significant increase in the rate of cesarean section, mainly accounted for by an increased rate of fetal distress and failure to progress in labor. Similarly the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery, meconium in labor and macrosomia had a statistically significantly higher incidence in the postdate group. These differences in outcome were already apparent at 41 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: Despite early initiation of fetal surveillance, starting at 40 completed weeks, postdate pregnancies are associated with an increased rate of emergency cesarean section, macrosomia and meconium in labor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Ohel, N Yaacobi, N Linder, J Younis. 1995. Postdate antenatal testing.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(95)02357-i

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Trial of labor vs. elective repeat cesarean section. AAFP Task Force on Clinical Policies for Patient Care.

A trial of labor after a previous low transverse cesarean section in the absence of ongoing contraindications is safe for most women. A comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted to determine outcomes, costs and women's preferences by method of delivery. About seven of 10 women who undergo a trial of labor after previous low transverse cesarean section can expect to deliver vaginally. The following differences in absolute risks were identified: a trial of labor was associated with a slightly increased risk of uterine rupture (0.24 percent) and a decreased risk of infection and fever (5.2 percent) and postpartum bleeding (0.59 percent) as compared with an elective repeat cesarean section. The difference in risk for newborns with an Apgar score of less than 7 at five minutes was 0.85 percent for infants delivered vaginally after a trial of labor versus infants delivered by elective repeat cesarean section. Financial cost (as measured by hospital charges) of cesarean delivery was 1.66 to 2.4 times greater than the cost of vaginal birth. This difference was due almost entirely to the longer length of hospital stay for women who had a cesarean delivery. When given the opportunity, about two-thirds of eligible women choose a trial of labor over elective repeat cesarean section. The reasons underlying women's preferences for a trial of labor or elective repeat cesarean section were diverse and changed during pregnancy. As a consequence, women's preferences for the method of delivery must be explored and respected throughout pregnancy and during the delivery process.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cesarean Section

[Effect of preeclampsia on neonatal morbidity].

In this study the outcome of two groups of premature infants born by caesarean section were compared from 52 hypertensive mothers with severe pre-eclampsia and from 30 normotensive mothers. The indication of caesarean section in pre-eclampsia was: proteinuria (> 500 mg/24 h), high blood pressure (> 160/100 mmHg), abnormal cardiotocogram and abnormality in flowmetry (fetal distress). Every infant was premature as well as in the control group. Significantly smaller mean birthweight and longer nursing-time in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were found in the pre-eclamptic group. Neonatal illnesses and complications are more frequent in the pre-eclamptic group. The time of ventilation was also longer. There are more early neurological disorders in the pre-eclamptic group than in the control one. The authors can establish that pre-eclamptic toxemia increases the morbidity in the neonatal period. This is due to the chronic intrauterine fetal distress as well as the retardation.

Cesarean Section