PubMed · 765433
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R C Pardee. 1975. How I do it-- a practical approach to silver plating.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/765433/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: Several studies have made comparisons in the dimensional accuracy of different elastomeric impression materials. Most have used two-dimensional measuring devices, which neglect to account for the dimensional changes that exist along a three-dimensional surface. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the dimensional accuracy of an impression technique using a polyether material (Impregum) and a vinyl poly siloxane material (President) using a laser scanner with three-dimensional superimpositional software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty impressions, 10 with a polyether and 10 with addition silicone, of a stone master model that resembled a dental arch containing three acrylic posterior teeth were cast in orthodontic stone. One plastic tooth was prepared for a metal crown. The master model and the casts were digitised with the non-contacting laser scanner to produce a 3D image. 3D surface viewer software superimposed the master model to the stone replica and the difference between the images analysed. RESULTS: The mean difference between the model and the stone replica made from Impregum was 0.072mm (SD 0.006) and that for the silicone 0.097mm (SD 0.005) and this difference was statistically significantly, p=0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Both impression materials provided an accurate replica of the prepared teeth supporting the view that these materials are highly accurate.
This article describes a selective-pressure impression technique for the edentulous maxilla that is intended to compensate for the polymerization shrinkage of heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate resin and provides improved palatal adaptation of the definitive denture base.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Impressions are made using high-viscosity putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials in conjunction with disposable plastic stock trays. The impression materials have been shown to be dimensionally stable. However, it remains unclear if the disposable plastic stock trays are rigid enough to resist deformation thus yielding potentially unreliable results. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the rigidity and ability to resist deformation of 6 commercially available disposable plastic stock trays and 1 metal stock tray when used in conjunction with a high-viscosity vinyl polysiloxane impression material. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten impressions were made with 1 putty vinyl polysiloxane material (Reprosil Putty) using each of the 6 tested disposable plastic stock trays, Sani-Trays (perforated), Sani-Trays (nonperforated), COE Disposable Spacer Tray (perforated), COE Disposable Spacer Tray (nonperforated), Bosworth Tray-Aways (perforated), Track-it Trays (perforated), and 1 metal stock tray (nonperforated), Cadco Dental Products, as a control on a mandibular plastic model. The dimensions of the tray in cross section at the mandibular right first molar area were measured before, during, and after the impression procedures with an electronic digital caliper. The cross-arch dimensions of the tray were measured at similar intervals. One examiner made all measurements and each measurement was repeatable within +/-0.01 mm. A split plot repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed and 2-sided P -values were calculated (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The results indicated that the disposable plastic trays tested were not sufficiently rigid to resist deformation when used with very high-viscosity putty material. Metal stock trays showed significantly less change in cross-arch dimension than plastic trays (F(1.68)=11.25, P =.001). Metal stock trays also showed significantly less change in cross-sectional arch dimension than plastic trays (F(1.68)=15.15, P<.001). CONCLUSION: When disposable plastic stock trays were tested in conjunction with very high-viscosity impression materials there was distortion of the tray both across the arch and in cross section.