Diabetes guidelines, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness study: a protocol, prototype, and paradigm.

Abstract

It is a milestone for our profession to have practice guidelines tested in a clinical trial that also provides cost-effectiveness data. Dietetics practitioners now have a model for studies examining MNT in other disorders and diseases. We also have an array of questions that can be asked in future studies. The challenges include examining the long-term management of diseases using MNT; determining changes in quality-of-life issues; and segmenting subjects according to variables likely to affect outcomes, such as duration of the disease. As a result of this and other studies related to diabetes (both completed and in progress), millions of people with NIDDM will be guided to achieve the best glycemic control possible within the framework of their lifestyles. The results of the DCCT may have implications for persons with NIDDM (18), as well as for dietitians (8). The UK Prospective Diabetes Study results should be released in the near future (19), and the VA Cooperative Study on Glycemic Control and Complications in Type II Diabetes (20) is examining intensive therapy for this population. Each of these studies emphasizes a treatment approach that places management of the disease in the hands of the client. This approach clearly is a paradigm shift: no longer are we talking about "diabetic diets." But then, maybe we just need to read a little history. In 1906, Hutchison (21) wrote," ... there is no such thing as 'a diabetic diet.'" And think about the information (or lack thereof) available to him.