PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7663036

Psyllium in hypercholesterolemia.

Abstract

In summary, within a controlled study situation, psyllium seems to be effective in lowering total and LDL cholesterol by 4-8% and 6-13%, respectively. Compared with conventional antilipidemic agents such as lovastatin, which lowers total cholesterol 30%, LDL cholesterol 40%, and triglycerides 20%, the effect of psyllium on lipids is minimal, and its use as a form of drug therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe hypercholesterolemia is not recommended. As an adjunct to AHA step 1 diet therapy, however, psyllium can be useful. The NCEP recently has stressed diet therapy as a first-line primary intervention in patients not a high risk from multiple risk factors or very high LDL cholesterol concentrations. Men ( < or = 45 y) and premenopausal women with no other risk factors and moderately high LDL cholesterol concentrations (4.1-5.7 mmol/l) are at relatively low risk for coronary events in the near future, and would therefore be suitable for diet therapy combined with adjunctive psyllium therapy. Psyllium is well tolerated with minor transient adverse effects (abdominal distention, excessive gas, flatulence) and has a good compliance record ( > or = 90%). It would be a useful adjunct to dietary intervention in low-risk patients with mild-to-moderate hypercholesterolemia. Further research is needed to evaluate psyllium's effect in women and its efficacy in long-term use.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E K Chan, D J Schroeder. 1995. Psyllium in hypercholesterolemia.. https://doi.org/10.1177/106002809502900613

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Poor applicability of the Friedewald formula in the assessment of serum LDL cholesterol for clinical purposes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the estimation of serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration by the Friedewald formula. METHODS: Modifications of the calculation formula are presented on the basis of ultracentrifugal separation of serum high-density lipoprotein and LDL cholesterol in the specimens collected (n = 1215) in a nationwide health survey. RESULTS: The formulas obtained from different subject groups differed relatively little from each other. The accuracy of the original Friedewald formula was poor; in about 36% of the subjects the error was more than 5% compared with ultracentrifugally obtained results. By applying the currently recommended coronary heart disease (CHD) risk categorizations, high proportions (5%-28%) of the subjects were classified into wrong CHD risk categories when LDL cholesterol was calculated with any of the formulas. At high serum triglyceride levels, misclassifications were especially common. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that even the most accurate LDL cholesterol calculation methods should be used with caution while classifying subjects into categories of CHD risk. In hypertriglyceridemic subjects, the calculation formulas probably should not be used at all.

Cholesterol, LDL