PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7669021

Assessment of fluoroscopic systems with a simple test object.

Abstract

A non-invasive test protocol and simple to use test object (the Westmead test object) has been devised to evaluate image quality of the complete fluoroscopic system, including the grid, under automatic brightness control (ABC). The new protocol tests the overall fluoroscopic system rather than individual components such as the image intensifier (II) tube, using the kVp and dose rate as determined by the ABC. A radiographic absorber is required to simulate clinical conditions by giving patient equivalent scatter, beam quality and exit beam intensity. Twenty (20) cm of water was used as an absorber and compared to commonly used copper sheet. It was found that no single thickness of copper gave both patient equivalent beam hardness and patient equivalent absorption under ABC conditions. The two absorbers, 1 mm copper and 20 cm water, were also trialed with the new test object in a survey of 23 fluoroscopic systems using the ABC protocol. Results for two test object features, Threshold Contrast and Contrast-Detail (Low Contrast Resolution), indicated an increased spread in the results for the water absorber when compared to the copper absorber. Of 15 units having a 23 cm field size, 10 units gave better Contrast-Detail results using a copper rather than a water absorber, with 5 results equivocal. Similarly, ten (10) units gave better Threshold Contrast results with copper, while 4 units were equivocal and 1 unit gave a poorer result with copper absorber when compared to a water absorber. It is therefore concluded that the test object and protocol should be used with a patient equivalent absorber (such as 20 cms water) for acceptance tests. Good image quality discrimination between units can then be obtained by correlating x-ray input dose with test object results, such as is given using the Contrast-Detail feature under ABC conditions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Ricciardello, D McLean. 1995. Assessment of fluoroscopic systems with a simple test object.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7669021/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Complex adaptive systems: a response to Luchins.

Luchins (2003, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 31(2), 183-186) distinguishes the mutual strengths and shortcomings of qualitative and quantitative approaches as applied to the complexities of evaluation psychiatric hospital functioning in particular, and behavioral healthcare practice in general. This brief response offers an examination of the complex interplay of factors within non-linear models in a conceptualization of complex adaptive systems for understanding causal factors in mental health administration as well as calling into question the myth of the relationship between measurement and hence control and understanding and prediction.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

In search of a familial cancer risk assessment tool.

Approximately one in three individuals will be affected by cancer in their lifetime in the United States, and some are at elevated risk because of family history. Although assessment of family history of cancer and cancer risk is the standard of care, the current health-care system appears unable to meet this need. Because individuals are increasingly using the Internet, web-based cancer risk assessment tools (CRATs) may provide a way to meet this need. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the types of familial CRATs available on the Internet and their nature. The current review evaluated five CRATs identified through an Internet search based on (i) their ability to identify those at the highest risk of cancer (i.e. those with hereditary cancer syndromes), (ii) their strengths and limitations based on criteria adapted from Rich and colleagues (2004, 2005), (iii) their readability based on four readability calculations, and (iv) their quality based on criteria from Health on the Net. The general limitations of CRATs as a whole were also delineated, including concerns about availability to those who are poor and underserved and those who have lower levels of literacy. Recommendations for future tools include assessing risk for a greater number of diseases, using theoretically driven approaches to increase the likelihood that individuals will engage in appropriate health behaviors, and making a greater effort to reach diverse populations.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research.

The overall aim of this study was to contribute to the development of metasynthesis through an analysis of the challenges involved. The study grew out of the critique of qualitative metaresearch raised by current developers of metamethodologies. Different views on the application of methodologies have emerged in the literature, contributing to confusion and ambiguity concerning the challenging questions of what, why, how, and who in metasynthesis research, which might increase the risk of misunderstanding. The roots of metasynthesis research are seen as multifaceted and influencing the development of the methods in different directions. The primary worth of metasynthesis is theoretical and/or methodological development (synthesis) combined with the potential for reflection: going beyond and behind the studies (meta). Metasynthesis research has also the potential to raise questions of research collaboration, culture, and language.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗