PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7670296

[Screening coloscopy: when and how?].

Abstract

Screening colonoscopy aims at a reduction of colorectal cancer mortality. The efficacy is undetermined due to lack of controlled trials. However, screening colonoscopy is generally accepted in asymptomatic patient with a considerably increased risk for carcinoma in particular in case of familial adenomatous polyposis coli, hereditary nonpolypous colorectal cancer syndrome and adenomas detected by sigmoidoscopy. A positive cost/benefit ratio can also be expected in first-degree relatives of patients with familial sporadic colorectal carcinoma. To date the efficacy of colonoscopic surveillance of patients with extensive ulcerative colitis remains undetermined in spite of an increased risk of cancer in the long-term course. In people with an average risk for colorectal cancer the probability of a development of carcinoma might be reduced by about 45% by once-only sigmoidoscopy performed at the age of 50-60 years. Further reduction can theoretically be expected from routine colonoscopy. However, before a general recommendation can be given, the efficacy must be proved in a randomised controlled trial.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Neuhaus. 1995. [Screening coloscopy: when and how?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7670296/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular genetic tests as a guide to surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis.

BACKGROUND: In familial adenomatous polyposis the only curative treatment is colectomy, and the choice of operation lies between restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). The RPC procedure carries a higher morbidity but, unlike IRA, removes the risk of subsequent rectal cancer. Since the course of familial adenomatous polyposis is influenced by the site of mutation in the polyposis gene, DNA analysis might be helpful in treatment decisions. METHODS: We evaluated the incidence of rectal cancer in polyposis patients who had undergone IRA, and examined whether the requirement for subsequent rectal excision because of cancer or uncontrollable polyps was related to the site of mutation. FINDINGS: Between 1956 and mid-1995, 225 patients registered at the Netherlands Polyposis Registry had undergone IRA. In 87 of them, a pathogenetic mutation was detected. 72 patients had a mutation located before codon 1250 and 15 patients after this codon. The cumulative risk of rectal cancer 20 years after surgery was 12%, and at that time 42% had undergone rectal excision. The risk of secondary surgery was higher in patients with mutations in the region after codon 1250 than in patients with mutations before this codon (relative risk 2.7, p < 0.05). INTERPRETATION: On this evidence, IRA should be the primary treatment for polyposis in patients with mutations before codon 1250, and RPC in those with mutations after this codon.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli

Screening for colorectal cancer, 1996.

Screening average-risk people aged 55 to 70 years for colorectal cancer is now a public health priority in Australia. Pilot studies of faecal occult blood testing are required to find ways of achieving optimal compliance and cost efficiency in the Australian health care setting. Flexible sigmoidoscopy probably should be used as complementary screening but further trials are needed. High-risk groups (family history of colorectal cancer, or previous ulcerative colitis, adenomas or cancer) should already be in surveillance programs.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli