PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7674258

Health status instruments / utilities.

N Bellamy·M Boers·D Felson·J Fries·D Furst·D Henry·M Liang·D Lovell·L March·V Strand
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Rheumatologists and other interested professionals at the OMERACT II conference formed small groups to discuss whether it was sensible to use a generic health status instrument in musculoskeletal disease trials. These instruments promise the possibility of comparison of health status between disease states. However, data is lacking on validity of the current generation of instruments to support their use. Participants had little personal experience with these instruments. After inspection, many voiced strong concerns over comprehensiveness and responsiveness. Many dimensions of health relevant for patients with this group of diseases were felt to be underrepresented. The dimension of adverse effects was universally absent, although this is more a problem of state of the art in trial methodology than a problem of these measures. Although there is little data, the small number of response categories in the dimensions covered, plus the lack of comprehensiveness, make it likely that responsiveness will be low. Further research, especially the adoption of one or more generic measures alongside specific measures, both in trials and in observational studies, is necessary to validate and improve the current generic measures. Until that time, valid conclusions and health policy regarding musculoskeletal diseases cannot be based on generic measures of health status.

Explore related subjects

Health StatusHumansMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatologyConference Proceedings

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N Bellamy, M Boers, D Felson, J Fries, D Furst, D Henry, M Liang, D Lovell, L March, V Strand. 1995. Health status instruments / utilities.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7674258/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Assessing local influence in principal component analysis with application to haematology study data.

In many medical and health studies, high-dimensional data are often encountered. Principal component analysis (PCA) is a commonly used technique to reduce such data to a few components that includes most of the information provided by the original data. However, PCA is known to be very sensitive to some abnormal observations. Therefore, it is essential to assess such sensitivity in PCA. In this paper, the assessments of local influence based on generalized influence function are developed under the case-weights and additive perturbation schemes, along with a discussion of the perturbation scheme and the generalized influence function approach. When perturbing different variables of the data, it is noted that the directions of the largest joint local influence for the eigenvalues are all the same. Moreover, these directions are completely determined by the score values of the observations, to which an approximate cut-off point is given. The proposed methods are applied to analyse a set of haematology study data for illustration. Results add new insights in finding influential observations in the studied data set.

Health Status↗
PubMed2007

Quality of life in nonallergic rhinitis.

Health-related quality-of-life questionnaires are instruments to assess the burden of a disease as perceived by the patient. Few data are available on the health-related quality of life of patients with nonallergic rhinitis, but data from studies of patients with allergic rhinitis show that rhinitis predominantly affects mental quality of life. This burden of rhinitis is associated with impaired sleep, excessive daytime sleepiness, concentration problems, and increased irritability.

Health Status↗