PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7684673

Constipation. Pathogenesis and management.

Abstract

Constipation is a collective term for different manifestations of different aetiology, pathology and treatment. It can be a symptom of organic disease or may disclose a colonic or anorectal functional disorder of unknown aetiology--this is called chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). CIC could be due to colonic or anorectal dysmotility. The latter presents as rectal inertia or outlet obstruction. Outlet obstruction manifests with excessive straining (strainodynia), although stools are soft and bulky. Four types of strainodynia can be identified: band, sphincter, levator and detrusor. Idiopathic infrequent defecation (oligofaecorrhoea) is revealed by hypertrophy and degenerated nerve plexus of the internal anal sphincter. It presents clinically with 'cone anus'. The 'mass squeeze contraction' theory describes rectal motility; the wave starts at the rectosigmoid junction (RSJ) and spreads distally. A 'pacemaker' was suggested to exist at the RSJ, organising rectal motility. Indeed, studies on electromechanical rectal activity revealed pacesetter and action potentials originating at the RSJ. Faecoflowmetry and water enema tests are new methods for investigating anorectal dysmotility, and reflexometry is important in assessment. The treatment of CIC is problematic and controversial. However, the patient should be given the chance to try pharmacological treatment at the start before embarking on surgery. Biofeedback may be helpful, especially in outlet obstruction constipation. Sphincter myotomy and myectomy, partial rectal resection and colectomy have been used, with variable results. Medical treatment with a fibre-rich diet or orally or rectally administered laxative agents may be indicated in the treatment of constipation, especially when a cause can not be identified. However, it is important to stress that the untoward effects which may result from laxative abuse could be greater than those of constipation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Shafik. 1993. Constipation. Pathogenesis and management.. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199345040-00005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Constipation and Psychiatric Disorders: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have shown a link between constipation (CN) and psychiatric disorders, including Schizophrenia (SP), Bipolar disorder (BD), Schizoaffective disorder (SD), and Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it is still unknown whether CN affects the occurrence and development of psychiatric disorders or whether psychiatric disorders cause the occurrence and development of CN. Therefore, this study used Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the relationship between CN and psychiatric disorders. METHOD: We used genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to assess the relationship between constipation (N = 411, 623) and four psychiatric disorders, including SP ( N = 77, 096), BD (N = 51, 710), SD ( N = 210, 962), PD (N = 482, 730 ), using bidirectional MR analysis. Inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR Egger (ME) and Weighted median (WM) were used as causal analysis methods. Cochran's Q test, funnel plot, MR Egger intercept test and Leave.one.out analysis were used to detect sensitivity. Confounding factors were analyzed and eliminated by LDtrait to avoid influencing the final MR Analysis result. RESULTS: The results of positive MR analysis indicated that there was no evidence of influence of constipation on SP (OR 1.043, 95%CI 0.946 - 1.149, P value = 0.398), BD (OR 1.114, 95%CI 0.995 - 1.248, P value = 0.062), SD (OR 0.934, 95%CI 0.674 - 1.294, P value = 0.682) and PD (OR 1.118, 95%CI 0.918 - 1.361, P value = 0.269) under gene prediction. Reverse MR analysis suggested that SP (OR 1.030, 95% CI 1.001-1.060, P value = 0.042) had a causal relationship with constipation. BD (OR 0.993, 95% CI 0.962-1.025, P value = 0.664), SD (OR 1.021, 95% CI 0.984-1.059, P value = 0.265) and PD (OR 1.004, 95% CI 0.974-1.035, P value = 0.790) were not associated with CN. CONCLUSION: There was a positive association between SP and CN. CN may have no exact causal relationship with BD, SD and PD, and the interaction mechanism between these diseases needs to be further explored.

Constipation

The effect of dietary fiber on bowel function following radical hysterectomy: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of high-fiber dietary instruction in relieving chronic constipation, a known and accepted complication of radical hysterectomy (RH). METHODS: Thirty-five women with a diagnosis of cervical cancer who were scheduled for RH were randomized into groups that followed either a high-fiber diet plan or their usual diet. Data were gathered using a validated subjective bowel function questionnaire (SBFQ); a typical day's intake form and food frequency tool; and a diary used to record food, medication, bowel, and exercise information. Patients were evaluated at 1, 4, and 7 months after surgery. RESULTS: Postoperatively, the dietary fiber intake was significantly higher for the treatment (T) group (22.9 g) than the control (C) group (12.4 g) (P = 0.007). With regard to intergroup comparisons, there were few differences at the first follow-up. By the second visit, the T group reported taking medications to achieve regularity less often (P = 0.0269), straining less often (P = 0.0210), having pain with bowel movement (BM) less often (P = 0.0116), and having crampy abdominal pain less often (P = 0.123) than the C group. Four significant positive changes occurred in the T group, whereas only one occurred in the C group. With regard to intragroup comparison, the significant changes in bowel function in the T group were generally positive, whereas all of the C group's significant changes were negative. According to summary questions on the SBFQ, the T group reported a significant change in the frequency of BM (P = 0.0096); however, the C group reported no significant changes. Analysis of bowel function records showed clearer differences. The T group took less time to defecate (P < 0. 001) but had more BMs accompanied by gas (P < 0.001). The C group had significantly more BMs with cramps (P < 0.001), straining (P < 0. 001), and retention (P < 0.001) and significantly more BMs, which were hard (P < 0.001). Two C patients dropped out of the study because of severe bowel dysfunction despite maximum medication. CONCLUSION: Dietary management seems to be an inexpensive effective therapeutic intervention for addressing bowel dysfunction associated with RH.

Constipation