PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7694554

Perioperative approaches to coagulation defects.

Abstract

Cardiac surgical procedures are known to be associated with coagulation defects and disordered hemostasis. Excessive perioperative and postoperative bleeding and the need for considerable volumes of blood and blood product transfusions are well recognized. The risks of blood transfusion with high donor-exposure levels have focused attention on blood conservation as a priority in reducing the complications of cardiac operations. Hemostatic defects may be related to patient-inherent coagulopathies, preexisting associated pathology, and preoperative drug therapy. In addition, hemostatic defects are induced during the operation itself. Two principal therapeutic approaches to this complex problem have evolved. Although different, these approaches are not mutually exclusive and may be used complementarily. The first is autotransfusion and the second is hemostatic drug therapy. Although many drugs have been tried, including antifibrinolytic agents (epsilon-aminocaproic acid, tranexamic acid), platelet-preserving agents (prostacyclin, dipyridamole), and desmopressin, the only drug that has shown significant and consistent efficacy in reducing bleeding in cardiac surgery patients is the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin. Aprotinin has been shown to be highly effective in reducing blood loss and blood and blood product transfusion requirements in high-risk patients. Clinical experience with aprotinin therapy in cardiac patients and specific issues such as dosage regimens and the target automated clotting time levels in patients on high-dose aprotinin therapy are outlined. Indications for the use of aprotinin and the balance between risk and benefit are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K M Taylor. 1993. Perioperative approaches to coagulation defects.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)91140-i

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Ultra-low dose aprotinin effects on reducing the need for blood transfusion in cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of ultra-low dose one million kallikrein inhibitor units (KIU) of aprotinin on bleeding and the need for transfusion after cardiac surgery. METHODS: We carried out this randomized clinical trial on 162 cardiac surgery patients in Shahid Madani Hospital, Tabriz, Iran from April 2004 to December 2005. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups of 81 individuals. In the aprotinin group, 0.5 million KIU infused before and 0.5 million KIU during cardiopulmonary bypass. In the placebo group, 100 ml normal saline was infused as above. The need to use fresh frozen plasma (FFP), packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfusion during, after operation, the rate of chest tubes drainage at 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery were measured in 2 groups. RESULTS: Chest tubes drainage at 6 hours after surgery was 190 +/- 24 ml in the aprotinin group and 266 +/- 33 ml in the placebo group (p=0.066). The amount of bleeding at 12 and 24 hours was significantly different between 2 groups (p=0.048, p=0.009). The frequency of blood products transfusion in the aprotinin group was 68% and in the placebo group was 75% (p=0.02). The number of PRBCs and FFP units transfused were significantly lower in the aprotinin group (p=0.000, p=0.005). Total amount of blood and products transfusion in the aprotinin group was 2.56 +/- 0.27 units and in placebo group it was 4.37 +/- 0.27 units (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Results indicate that the use of one million KIU of aprotinin in cardiac surgery is effective in reducing postoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements.

Aprotinin↗

Aprotinin; friend or foe? A review of recent medical literature.

Recent articles published in peer review journals have questioned the safety of using aprotinin in patients having heart surgery. Also, evidence has been published to suggest an increase in renal events in patients given aprotinin when compared to those where tranexamic acid was used. The present review will focus principally on the first of these articles in relation to previously published data and experience.

Aprotinin↗