PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7703654

Normalisation: what it means in practice.

Abstract

Much of the development in the area of learning disabilities has been the result of normalisation. However, the term lacks definition. This article will explore the available definitions and outline some key components to be considered when incorporating normalisation into service provision.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

O Barr. Normalisation: what it means in practice.. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.1995.4.2.90

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Psychotic symptoms and apolipoprotein E genotypes in an elderly population.

BACKGROUND: Psychotic symptoms have been found to be more common in demented elderly persons. Genetic variation in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene is reported to be associated with variation in the risk of Alzheimer's dementia. This study reports on variables associated with psychotic symptoms including APOE, in demented and nondemented elderly persons. METHODS: A population of 668 elderly persons was examined. APOE genotype was available in 309 individuals. RESULTS: Psychotic symptoms were found to be associated with dementia, a previous psychiatric history, female gender, being less educated, disability in daily living and institutionalisation. In the nondemented group, psychotic symptoms were equally common in subjects with or without the epsilon 4 present. In the demented subjects, psychotic symptoms were slightly more common, although not significant, in subjects without the epsilon 4 genotype. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistical significant difference in APOE genotype between subjects with and without psychotic symptoms, stratified by dementic diagnosis.

Activities of Daily Living

Is work status of low back pain patients best described by an automated device or by a questionnaire?

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of patients with subacute occupational back pain. OBJECTIVES: To study the relation between a marketed opto-electric device measuring trunk kinematics, a widely used specific functional capacity questionnaire, and work status in back pain patients, and to assess the responsiveness to change in work status of the opto-electric device and the questionnaire. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several instruments have been developed to evaluate the functional capacities of patients with back pain, but the relation between these instruments and work status has rarely been studied. METHODS: The relation between the opto-electric device, the questionnaire, and work status in patients with back pain was evaluated. The study population was a prospective cohort of patients with subacute back pain who were absent from regular work for more than 4 weeks. All data were compiled blindly on the same day, at study entry (4 weeks after work accident), and at 12, 24, and 52 weeks after the work accident. The validity of the questionnaire and opto-electric device scores was assessed with partial correlation analyses, standardized response mean, logistic regression analyses, and receiver operating characteristics curves. RESULTS: The correlation between the questionnaire and opto-electric device scores was low. The questionnaire scores were significantly related to work status, but the opto-electric device scores were not. The questionnaire was responsive to change in work status, whereas the opto-electric device was not. CONCLUSIONS: The opto-electric device scores were not related to either functional capacity scores (questionnaire) or work status in patients with low back pain, and the opto-electric device was not responsive to change in work status. Conversely, the questionnaire was related to work status and was responsive to change in work status.

Activities of Daily Living