PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7705078

Computer program for the proportional hazards measurement error model.

Abstract

The Cox-regression analysis based on the partial likelihood assumes that the covariates, or independent variables, are exactly measured without error. If the covariates are subject to measurement error and the error-prone observed values are used in the analysis by simply ignoring the measurement error, the results are generally biased and misleading; the bias does not diminish as the sample size is increased. The objective of the paper is to briefly describe a method searching for asymptotically unbiased estimates of the parameters correcting for the measurement error in the Cox-regression model and to present a FORTRAN program to perform the correction method; asymptotic standard errors of the corrected estimates are also obtained. The measurement error distribution, that is the conditional distribution of the observed values given the true value, must be specified. An advantage of the method described is that it does not require any assumption on the distribution of the true values; in other words, <--> values are treated as unknown fixed constants. It can accommodate tied failure times unless ties are very frequent, and any censorship or loss to follow-up are allowed as long as they are 'independent of survival'.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Nakamura, K Akazawa. 1994. Computer program for the proportional hazards measurement error model.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(94)90204-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Estimating effective population size from samples of sequences: inefficiency of pairwise and segregating sites as compared to phylogenetic estimates.

It is known that under neutral mutation at a known mutation rate a sample of nucleotide sequences, within which there is assumed to be no recombination, allows estimation of the effective size of an isolated population. This paper investigates the case of very long sequences, where each pair of sequences allows a precise estimate of the divergence time of those two gene copies. The average divergence time of all pairs of copies estimates twice the effective population number and an estimate can also be derived from the number of segregating sites. One can alternatively estimate the genealogy of the copies. This paper shows how a maximum likelihood estimate of the effective population number can be derived from such a genealogical tree. The pairwise and the segregating sites estimates are shown to be much less efficient than this maximum likelihood estimate, and this is verified by computer simulation. The result implies that there is much to gain by explicitly taking the tree structure of these genealogies into account.

Likelihood Functions

Random effects models with non-parametric priors.

We discuss the performance of non-parametric maximum likelihood (NPML) estimators for the distribution of a univariate random effect in the analysis of longitudinal data. For continuous data, we analyse generated and real data sets, and compare the NPML method to those that assume a Gaussian random effects distribution and to ordinary least squares. For binary outcomes we use generated data to study the moderate and large-sample performance of the NPML compared with a method based on a Gaussian random effect distribution in logistic regression. We find that estimated fixed effects are compatible for all approaches, but that appropriate standard errors for the NPML require adjusting the likelihood-based standard errors. We conclude that the non-parametric approach provides an attractive alternative to Gaussian-based methods, though additional evaluations are necessary before it can be recommended for general use.

Likelihood Functions