PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7706576

Clinical practice guidelines: from methodological to practical issues.

Abstract

The main goal of clinical practice guidelines is to help clinical decision by practitioners, who can not integrate in their daily practice all the published data concerning new technologies and knowledge. Guidelines also have growing applications in the ethical, legal, socio-economic, public policy and health care funding fields. This article describes the various methodologies that have been proposed to develop guidelines. These methods rely to varying degrees on formal methods of analysis of scientific evidence and expert opinions. Then a step by step process is described, that should ensure a rigorous, feasible and explicit guideline development and lead to valid and applicable recommendations. In order for guidelines to be used, they have to be efficiently implemented. Respective efficiency and justification of educational and coercive methods of implementation are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N Roche, P Durieux. 1994. Clinical practice guidelines: from methodological to practical issues.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01705730

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medical heuristics: the silent adjudicators of clinical practice.

Robust scientific conclusions are too sparse to inform fully most of the choices that physicians must make about tests and treatments. Instead, ad hoc rules of thumb, or "heuristics," must guide them, and many of these are problematic. Physicians extrapolate from the small samples studied by clinical trials to general populations, but they do so inconsistently. Many physicians live by rules that dictate "not treating the numbers," correcting abnormalities slowly, achieving diagnostic certainty, and operating now to avoid "greater" risk in the future. Yet in each case, historical trends or statistical realities suggest either doing the opposite or investing in more discriminating heuristics. The heuristics of medicine should be discussed, criticized, refined, and then taught. More uniform use of explicit and better heuristics could lead to less practice variation and more efficient medical care.

Clinical Competence