A computational model for electron backscattering in electron dosimetry.

T Kellogg; A K Ray

doi:10.1118/1.597595

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7715566

A computational model for electron backscattering in electron dosimetry.

T Kellogg·A K Ray

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A one-dimensional electron transport algorithm based on the ideas of invariant imbedding has been developed and applied to the problem of electron backscattering in electron dosimetry. Results have been compared with experimental and Monte Carlo results. Agreement appears to be reasonable at low incident energies (0.5 to 10 MeV) and low Z(Z < or = 65) materials.

Explore related subjects

Electrons Models, Theoretical Radiometry Scattering, Radiation Software Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

T Kellogg, A K Ray. 1995. A computational model for electron backscattering in electron dosimetry.. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597595

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Technical note: reconstructing dose distributions from manually planned electron boosts in breast radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: In breast radiotherapy, delivery of manually-calculated electron boosts limits retrospective dose-response analyses as dose distribution is unavailable. This work evaluates the feasibility of reconstructing dose distributions from manually planned electron boosts in breast-conserving radiotherapy. METHODS: Only 72 out of 198 breast cancer patients had complete stored dose distributions from sequential electron boosts in the REQUITE study. Arbitrary data from 70/72 patients were used to develop and validate dose reconstruction method. Twenty patients were used to determine optimal parameters for Monte-Carlo-based (MC) electron dose reconstruction on RayStation (v.11B-R), considering CT-calibration curve, MC-history number, andcalculation grid resolution. Remaining 50 patients were used to quantify dose reconstruction accuracy. The similarity between reconstructed and stored dose was evaluated using 3D-gamma index and dosimetric parameters extracted from breast and tumour bed contours. Dose difference location was evaluated using dose-location histogram. RESULTS: Calculation grid resolution significantly impacted electron dose distribution (p < 0.01), where the finest grid (0.15 cm) showed highest similarity to stored doses. CT-calibration curve and MC-history number had a negligible influence on dose reconstruction. Dosimetric difference between reconstructed and stored doses was < 1 Gy for breast and tumour bed. Reconstructed dose was achieved > 90% gamma passing rate in the validation set. However, around 2.5 Gy dose differences were observed at the skin and tissue interface regions. CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective electron boost dose reconstruction is feasible with acceptable accuracy, and could increase data completeness in large cohort studies. Caution is advised when assessing dose near tissue interface and further validation is needed outside the REQUITE dataset.

Electrons↗

PubMed1997

A metalloradical mechanism for the generation of oxygen from water in photosynthesis.

In plants and algae, photosystem II uses light energy to oxidize water to oxygen at a metalloradical site that comprises a tetranuclear manganese cluster and a tyrosyl radical. A model is proposed whereby the tyrosyl radical functions by abstracting hydrogen atoms from substrate water bound as terminal ligands to two of the four manganese ions. Molecular oxygen is produced in the final step in which hydrogen atom transfer and oxygen-oxygen bond formation occur together in a concerted reaction. This mechanism establishes clear analogies between photosynthetic water oxidation and amino acid radical function in other enzymatic reactions.

Electrons↗

PubMed1997

Lying-on position of total skin electron therapy.

PURPOSE: A technique for whole-body electron therapy with the patient in a lying position has been developed. This technique allows Total Skin Electron Therapy (TSET) for those patients who were previously unable to be treated in a conventional standing position. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study was carried out on a Varian 2100C linear accelerator with a 6 MeV high dose rate electron beam. The collimator was open to a width of 36 x 36 cm. There were two main procedures, with six dual-field techniques: 1) two static AP/PA vertical dual fields (VDF): the patient laid on the floor transversely under the collimator when the gantry was in a vertical position. A 0.6 cm acrylic board was placed 15 cm away from the patient, then the gantry was rotated 25 degrees clockwise and counterclockwise to treat the patient in the supine and prone positions, respectively. 2) Four oblique junction fields (OJF): the patient laid on the floor in a prone and supine position parallel to the wave guide at (227 - body thickness x tan 60 degrees) cm away from the vertical axis of the gantry, then the gantry was rotated 60 degrees toward the patient. A 0.6 cm acrylic board was placed 15 cm away from the patient perpendicular to the beam. The patient was move along the field central axis. It allowed the patient's body to be within the 160 cm effective treatment profile. When the patient's body axis move 5 degrees toward the lateral side of the field central axis, we could obtain a better dose distribution in the vertex of the scalp and the soles of the feet. The angle of the VDF was measured by chamber detectors to obtain the effective treatment profile. Likewise, the optimal profile for the OJF was determined by the same procedures. The Rando phantom was used to measure the superficial dose of the body. RESULTS: The dimension of effective treatment profile for the VDF was 188 x 72 cm at 87% dose level For the OJF, we had to move the patient along the field central axis to obtain the effective treatment profile in a 180 x 85 cm dimension at a 87% dose level. The vertex and sole dose measured in this setup was in the range of 80-88%. CONCLUSIONS: The empirical data showed that the lying-on position for TSET was technically feasible. The dose distribution in the body surface was also compatible with the Stanford standing technique. The nonambulatory skin malignancy patient can be treated in a comfortable and reproducible position.

Electrons↗