PubMed · 7720245
HLA class II genotyping: two assay systems compared.
Abstract
In the last few years, a variety of DNA-based human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing methods have emerged, revealing the extreme polymorphism of HLA genes. This polymorphism makes it difficult for a clinical laboratory to establish the best HLA typing strategy. In this study we have compared two techniques for performing HLA-DRB typing: a commercial rapid assay based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by reverse dot-blot hybridization of the PCR products (the Inno-LiPA assay), and a method based on PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. We found that both methods provide reliable results with a high rate of concordance (97%) and that Inno-LiPA is convenient for large-scale routine typing. However, if a high-resolution allelic typing is required, each method lacks accuracy but using them in association improves the accuracy of the results.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Thonnard, F Deldime, M Heusterspreute, B Delepaut, F Hanon, M De Bruyère, M Philippe. 1995. HLA class II genotyping: two assay systems compared.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7720245/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.