PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7728343

Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic pseudocysts.

Abstract

The management of pancreatic pseudocysts is complex. It demands an understanding of the natural history of the disease and an appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of the treatment options available. Endoscopic therapy represents a valuable alternative to surgery in the subset of patients with appropriate anatomy. Success and relapse rates for endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts are comparable to alternative methods, but require careful patient selection and operator expertise. Complication rates vary widely in published studies. It is hoped that technical innovation will reduce the risks. For example, the use of an aspiration needle to localize the pseudocyst and endoscopic ultrasound to define local vascular anatomy are significant advances. Strictly limiting the size of the opening created in cyst-gastrostomy and cyst-duodenostomy should reduce the risk of hemorrhage. Although technically difficult, transpapillary drainage is an option worth considering in patients with fluid collections associated with pancreatic ductal disruption. No single technique offers the desired combination of 100% success and no complications. Surgery, percutaneous drainage, and therapeutic endoscopy offer a variety of treatment options that can be tailored to the needs of individual patients with pancreatic pseudocyst.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Lawson, J Baillie. 1995. Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic pseudocysts.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7728343/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗