PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7728515

The regression hypothesis: communicative continuum vs. parametrically defined grammars.

M L Schnitzer
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Proposals concerning the regression hypothesis in aphasia presented in Grodzinsky (1990) and Schnitzer (1989, 1990) are compared. It is argued that Grodzinsky's model, which is syndrome-based, is observationally inadequate, and thus fails to lend aphasiological support to a neurophysiologically realized central language system along the lines of Chomsky's Theory of Principles and Parameters. Schnitzer's approach rejects the notion of mental grammars and interprets aphasic regression microgenetically, along the lines of Givón's continuum. It is argued that this approach has the potential to become truly explanatory.

Explore related subjects

Aphasia, BrocaBrainHumansLanguage DisordersSpeech PerceptionVerbal LearningComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M L Schnitzer. 1995. The regression hypothesis: communicative continuum vs. parametrically defined grammars.. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1995.1008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Speed of lexical activation in nonfluent Broca's aphasia and fluent Wernicke's aphasia.

Rapid, automatic access to lexical/semantic knowledge is critical in supporting the tight temporal constraints of on-line sentence comprehension. Based on findings of "abnormal" lexical priming in nonfluent aphasics, the question of disrupted automatic lexical activation has been the focus of many recent efforts to understand their impaired sentence comprehension capabilities. The picture that emerges from this literature is, however, unclear. Nonfluent Broca's aphasic patients show inconsistent, not absent, lexical priming, and there is little consensus about the conditions under which they do and do not prime. The most parsimonious explanation for the variable findings from priming studies to date is that the primary disturbance in Broca's lexical activation has something to do with speed of activation. Broca's aphasic patients prime when sufficient time is allowed for activation to spread among associates. To examine this "slowed activation" hypothesis, the time course of lexical activation was examined using a list priming paradigm. Temporal delays between successive words ranged from 300 to 2100 msec. One nonfluent Broca's aphasic patient and one fluent Wernicke's patient were tested. Both patients displayed abnormal priming patterns, though of different sorts. In contrast to elderly subjects, who prime at relatively short interstimulus intervals (ISIs) beginning at 500 msec, the Broca's aphasic subject showed reliable automatic priming but only at a long ISI of 1500 msec. That is, this subject retained the ability to access lexical information automatically if allowed sufficient time to do so, a finding that may help explain disrupted comprehension of normally rapid conversational speech. The Wernicke's aphasic subject, in contrast, showed normally rapid initial activation but continued to show priming over an abnormally long range of delays, from 300 msec through 1100 msec. This protracted priming suggests failure to dampen activation and might explain the semantic confusion exhibited by fluent Wernicke's patients.

Aphasia, Broca↗
PubMed1997

Surface dyslexia in nonfluent progressive aphasia.

This article presents the case of a 59-year-old male, JH, with a 6-year history of primary progressive aphasia (PPA), a disorder characterized by isolated language deterioration with relative preservation of other cognitive abilities. JH also shows typical features of surface dyslexia, a reading disorder exemplified by the selective preservation of phonological reading. One recent theory is that surface dyslexia in individuals with PPA results from a loss of semantic knowledge. In this paper we consider an additional possibility and present data supporting the notion that surface dyslexia may also arise from the malfunction in the links between semantic representations and phonology. JH has remarkably preserved lexical semantic knowledge when assessed on tasks that do not require verbal output. Further, item-by-item comparisons of his oral reading and comprehension ability show no significant correspondence between his reading and semantic knowledge. These findings lead us to conclude that, in JH's case, the surface dyslexia is attributable not to a semantic deficit per se but rather to the inability to access phonological information from semantics. JH's language profile is considered in relation to potential sources of surface dyslexia and other cases of progressive aphasia.

Aphasia, Broca↗