PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7728615

[Spinal anesthesia in Africa. Risks, precautions].

Abstract

Practice of anaesthesia in Africa rural zones needs adaptation to its peculiarities: pathology abundance, equipment and skilled staff shortage, medical and surgical acts delegation. It is high risk anaesthesia to do in a perspective of public health. Spinal anaesthesia, simple and cheap, is the technique of choice used for 86% of operations in our hospital. However it may induce sympathetic tone abolishment with marked falls in blood pressure and even cardiac arrest. To suppress the part of chance in this high risk context, we have made repetitive sympathetic perturbations prophylaxis, thanks to 2 protocoles. One issued from "saddle-block" allows genital and below surgery. Main worry is to get sure sensitive level, below D10. We use hyperbare technique, so blood pressure falls are less than 5%. The other is for abdominal surgery. Main worry is hypotension prophylaxis and management. We use hypobare technique, which allows Trendelenburg position with low cost and low risk autotransfusion. Other measures to reduce incidence of hypotension include prophylactic administration of atropine, ephedrine, and oxygen during the installation of anaesthesia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Gueguen. 1994. [Spinal anesthesia in Africa. Risks, precautions].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7728615/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis in an HIV-positive patient in western Africa.

A 36-year-old HIV1-positive woman presented with a 6-month history of a progressive papular and nodular eruption of the face and subsequent extensive spread to the rest of the skin. The diagnosis of diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis was established by direct examination and skin biopsy. This atypical form had a dramatic improvement after a 21-day treatment with meglumine antimoniate. This clinical form may be confused with other endemic diseases in western Africa, especially leprosy.

Africa, Western↗

Admixture in Mexico City: implications for admixture mapping of type 2 diabetes genetic risk factors.

Admixture mapping is a recently developed method for identifying genetic risk factors involved in complex traits or diseases showing prevalence differences between major continental groups. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is at least twice as prevalent in Native American populations as in populations of European ancestry, so admixture mapping is well suited to study the genetic basis of this complex disease. We have characterized the admixture proportions in a sample of 286 unrelated T2D patients and 275 controls from Mexico City and we discuss the implications of the results for admixture mapping studies. Admixture proportions were estimated using 69 autosomal ancestry-informative markers (AIMs). Maternal and paternal contributions were estimated from geographically informative mtDNA and Y-specific polymorphisms. The average proportions of Native American, European and, West African admixture were estimated as 65, 30, and 5%, respectively. The contributions of Native American ancestors to maternal and paternal lineages were estimated as 90 and 40%, respectively. In a logistic model with higher educational status as dependent variable, the odds ratio for higher educational status associated with an increase from 0 to 1 in European admixture proportions was 9.4 (95%, credible interval 3.8-22.6). This association of socioeconomic status with individual admixture proportion shows that genetic stratification in this population is paralleled, and possibly maintained, by socioeconomic stratification. The effective number of generations back to unadmixed ancestors was 6.7 (95% CI 5.7-8.0), from which we can estimate that genome-wide admixture mapping will require typing about 1,400 evenly distributed AIMs to localize genes underlying disease risk between populations of European and Native American ancestry. Sample sizes of about 2,000 cases will be required to detect any locus that contributes an ancestry risk ratio of at least 1.5.

Africa, Western↗