PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7729839

Echographic image mean gray level changes with tissue dynamics: a system-based model study.

Abstract

In echography, several groups have reported a systematic decrease in the total backscattering intensity or image mean gray level during myocardial contraction with a minimum at end-systole and maximum at end-diastole. In order to investigate this phenomenon, we use a three-dimensional inhomogeneous continuum model to mimic the tissue as a collection of cells that scatter the acoustic wave due to their individual impedance. The mathematical analysis clearly shows the relationship between the mean gray level changes and the size, orientation, and deformation of the cells that compose the tissue, as well as the frequency of the transducer. Using a myocardial model example, the mean gray level changes reported in the literature during contraction are described in terms of changes in orientation and deformation of cardiac fibers. The model is simple and should set the ground for further study and analysis of speckle pattern changes during tissue motion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Meunier, M Bertrand. 1995. Echographic image mean gray level changes with tissue dynamics: a system-based model study.. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.376133

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Preload reduction to unmask the characteristic Doppler features of constrictive pericarditis. A new observation.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory variation of > or = 25% in mitral E velocity is a characteristic Doppler echocardiographic feature in constrictive pericarditis. However, a subset of patients with constriction do not exhibit the typical respiratory change, most likely because of marked increase in the left atrial pressure, and preload reduction may unmask the respiratory variation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 12 patients with surgically confirmed constrictive pericarditis who had < 25% respiratory variation in mitral E velocity during an initial preoperative examination, the Doppler study was repeated after an attempt to decrease left ventricular filling pressure. At baseline, mean mitral E velocity was similar after inspiration and expiration (0.81 +/- 0.24 and 0.84 +/- 0.21 m/s, respectively). On repeat Doppler examination, with the patient in a head-up tilt or sitting position the decrease in mitral E velocity with inspiration (0.61 +/- 0.13 m/s) was significant (P < .004), whereas it did not change significantly with expiration. The mean percent respiratory change in E velocity was 5 +/- 7% at baseline and 32 +/- 28% with preload reduction. Eight (75%) of the 12 patients developed respiratory variation of > or = 25%. CONCLUSIONS: When the respiratory variation in Doppler mitral E velocity is blunted or absent during the evaluation of suspected constrictive pericarditis, repeat Doppler recording of mitral flow velocities after maneuvers to decrease preload is recommended to unmask the characteristic respiratory variation in mitral E velocity.

Echocardiography