PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7736417

Biomedical imaging modalities: a tutorial.

R Acharya·R Wasserman·J Stevens·C Hinojosa
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The introduction of advanced imaging technologies has improved significantly the quality of medical care available to patients. Non-invasive imaging modalities allow a physician to make increasingly accurate diagnoses and render precise and measured modes of treatment. Current uses of imaging technologies include laboratory medicine, surgery, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, and diagnostic radiology. This paper provides an overview of most of the popular imaging modalities currently in clinical use. It is hoped that a general understanding of the modality from which an image is derived will help researchers in the subsequent analysis of the image data.

Explore related subjects

Angiography, Digital SubtractionDiagnostic ImagingElectromagnetic FieldsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingQuality of Health CareTomography, Emission-ComputedTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Acharya, R Wasserman, J Stevens, C Hinojosa. Biomedical imaging modalities: a tutorial.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-6111(94)00043-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

The concept of archiving unedited and edited digital coronary angiograms.

Digital image data acquired during cardiac catheterization will soon be archived on standardized digital storage media. However, with the enormous amount of generated data, considerable time will be wasted at later reviewing or at conferences, or when performing additional quantitative studies. As a result major advantages of a digital acquisition and archiving technique will be lost. The concept of two way archiving includes an unedited (primary) digital archive as well as a (secondary) archive edited by operator guided "intelligent" data reduction (IDR). IDR is based upon the elimination of useless and redundant frame sequences (FS), documentation of coronary interventions on one representative single frame (F) and on the reduction of relevant FS and physiological data to and ECG-controlled representative cardiac cycle (CC). With a heart rate of 72/min and an acquisition rate of 12.5 F/s a documentation of each FS may be obtained with only 10 F. A redundancy-free set of 130 F of a diagnostic study as well as only 41-85 F of an interventional study will be archived on an individual 3.5" MOD or on a CD-R. Two cardiologists and two cardiosurgeons studied independently 24 IDR-edited and the corresponding unedited digital angiograms and found no significant differences in the diagnostically relevant coronary morphology and left ventricular function. IDR provides an edited digital coronary angiogram, e.g. a set of images free of redundance and without loss of relevant information. Uneditable FS can be archived in their unedited (primary) form. IDR is managed on-line by an operator interacting with the angiographer.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗
PubMed1997

[The diagnosis of intra-abdominal hemorrhages with CO2 as the contrast medium].

PURPOSE: Evaluation of carbon dioxide (CO2) as contrast medium for detection of intraabdominal haemorrhage. METHOD: We performed in 5 patients 7 DSA examinations (one with upper and three with lower gastrointestinal bleeding, one traumatic spleen rupture) using an iodinated contrast-medium and CO2 for the localisation of haemorrhage. RESULTS: With iodinated contrast medium it was possible to localise the haemorrhage in three of 5 patients. With CO2 the localisation was possible in all cases. There were no side effects. CONCLUSION: CO2 is useful for detection of intraabdominal bleeding. Even in cases with negative angiographic results with iodinated contrast medium, CO2 may enable localisation of the bleeding vessel. Because of this, we use CO2 and iodinated contrast media in all cases of intraabdominal haemorrhage. Further studies are required.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗
PubMed1997

Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent observations from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) questioned the reliability of peak systolic velocity (PSV) criteria for grading carotid stenosis. We compared PSV and angiographic measurements at our center together with known physiological relationships to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent both color-coded duplex ultrasound and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography were studied. PSV was determined with angle correction at the site of the tightest internal carotid artery narrowing. Carotid stenosis was measured on angiograms with the North American (N) and common carotid (C) methods. Variables for the stepwise multiple linear regression analysis were selected from an axisymmetrical flow model. RESULTS: Eighty bifurcations were imaged in 40 patients. PSV did not exceed 140 cm/s in normal vessels. In diseased arteries, PSV increased proportionally with increasing stenosis and decreased to 0 cm/s at occlusion. In stepwise selection of polynomial terms, the linear, quadratic, and cubic correlations of .38, .17, and .22 for N and .45, .24, and .03 for C were found to be significant (P < .02). When only stenosed vessels were evaluated, PSV increase was found with greater scatter for the N measurement: r2 = .73 for N and r2 = .85 for C (n = 50; P = .03 for the difference between two correlated correlation coefficients). CONCLUSIONS: At our laboratory PSV consistently correlates well with N and C angiographic measurements, as determined with a simple flow model. The complex nature of these correlations and greater variability of the N measurement should be taken into account when data from different centers are compared.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗