PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7741669

Understanding the objective structured clinical examination.

Abstract

A number of factors have contributed to the relatively rapid development and growth of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCA) as a viable and popular assessment tool. Among these was an increased need, expressed both by training institutions and certifying and licensing bodies, for valid performance-based assessment approaches. That this need became apparent at a time when concern and interest in performance-based assessment in education generally was growing, was fortuitous and contributed to the developments in medical education. In medical education important consequences were the growing interest and expertise in two distinct areas, the psychometrics of performance assessment and the use of standardized (simulated) patients in the teaching and assessment of clinical skills. Collaboration between people working in these two areas greatly facilitated the rapid development and refinement of the OSCA. Currently, there appears to be general acceptance of the legitimacy of this assessment approach. Research now seems to be directed at resolving remaining important technical problems (e.g. standard setting); the design and implementation of large scale national and regional certifying and licensing examinations are the primary current development challenges. There is a large and still growing body of related literature and many presentations about this assessment approach are given at medical education conferences.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A I Rothman. 1995. Understanding the objective structured clinical examination.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1995.tb00641.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗