PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7745142

An innovative solution to assessing staff learning needs.

Abstract

Traditional needs assessments for continuing education reflect personal interests and perceptions of learning needs rather than actual knowledge deficits. With an influx of new staff in a rapidly expanding neonatal ICU, time constraints made it imperative to accurately assess the learning needs of the novice practitioner. A needs assessment tool, developed by the unit-based education committee, identified gaps in knowledge among NICU staff. The questionnaire consisted of direct questions covering aspects of clinical and professional issues in neonatal care. The respondents were asked to indicate their ability to answer the questions completely, partially, or not at all. The questions were categorized according to patient populations and professional issues, thereby providing curriculum for continuing education specific to identified learning needs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Maloney, J W Kane. An innovative solution to assessing staff learning needs.. https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-19950301-07

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The changing prognosis of ARDS.

It seems likely that the prognosis of ARDS has indeed improved. To what extent is still uncertain, and unfortunately, from what is unknown. As a result, we don't know where to concentrate additional effort and resources. If survival has improved, changes in supportive therapy are the most likely cause. Thus, it is cynical and misdirected to assume that all methods of "supportive" care are equivalent, and that efforts to optimize such care are less worthy than those directed toward potentially specific causes. The situation is analogous to that seen previously in the management of myocardial infarction. Although breakthroughs in thrombolysis and angioplasty have occupied our attention in the past decade, the mortality from myocardial infarction fell dramatically in the decades that preceded these new therapeutic advances. All such improvements are to be hailed and appreciated, and further improvements, both in supportive and specific therapy should be anticipated as likely and welcome.

Critical Care