PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7746981

Using sign score regression models to select variables in case-control studies.

Abstract

This paper evaluates the performance of four variable selection methods suitable for case-control studies. Two of the methods are logistic regression and the rank transformed version of it which uses the ranks of the explanatory variables in place of the original observations. The third method is based on Kendall's tau b correlations. I propose a fourth method, a sign score regression model to select variables. To evaluate these four methods, I generate many data sets for a case group and a control group with the use of several different distributions and covariance matrices. I evaluate the methods on their ability to select correctly the variables related to case-control status while not selecting the unrelated variables. Using this criterion, the sign score regression method and the tau b method are more effective than the other two methods with uncorrelated or weakly correlated variables. The sign score regression method is more effective than the tau b method for all simulations that use normal variables and for some that use log-normal variables. Overall, the sign score regression method is the most effective variable selection method for data sets that have low or moderate correlations between variables.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T W O'Gorman. 1995-02-28. Using sign score regression models to select variables in case-control studies.. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780140408

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗