PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7747254

Localization studies in patients with hyperparathyroidism.

Abstract

Patients with hyperparathyroidism who have not had previous neck surgery do not require preoperative localization because of the high success rate of cervical exploration (95%) and the limited sensitivity and specificity of all imaging modalities currently in use. Successful parathyroid exploration requires knowledge of the normal and frequently encountered variations in parathyroid anatomy (Fig. 4). Experience permits recognition of often subtle multiple gland disease. In skilled surgical hands, results are excellent with minimal morbidity. When recurrent or persistent disease or previously operated patients are encountered, confirmation of the diagnosis and attempts at localization should precede operation. Technetium sestamibi SPECT imaging and ultrasonography with FNA of suspicious glands are complementary tests that are readily available, inexpensive, and well tolerated by patients. If these tests are unsuccessful, MRI, CT, and invasive procedures should be pursued until the gland is localized.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B K Mitchell, R C Merrell, B K Kinder. 1995. Localization studies in patients with hyperparathyroidism.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6109(16)46635-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗