PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7757444

Image-guided access techniques.

Abstract

For increasing safety in access and guidance of endoscopes and instruments, fast real-time radiologic imaging should be integrated. Open designed Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computer Tomography (CT), and Electron Beam Tomography (EBT) scanners permit adequate transparency of the operative field. CT and EBT as hybrid scanners can be combined with fluoroscopy. MRI avoids X-ray exposure and entails the possibility of 3D localisation, while open access and keyhole imaging allows nearly real-time guidance of instruments. EBT has the largest gantry (90 cm) for using long instruments, and the image acquisition requires only 50 msec (34 images/sec at 8 levels). However, computed reconstruction of the data takes about 3 times longer than conventional CT. Until EBT can be accelerated, CT will be the golden standard of guidance-techniques in high risk areas, because the tips of the instruments can be precisely visualised within +/- 0.5 mm (MRI: 3.5 mm). MRI-guidance can be used for low risk access techniques. This safe interactive transparent guidance technique has the potential to reduce complications, and it adds significant advantages to micro-invasive operative procedures such as percutaneous diskectomies, pain and cancer therapy with ethanol, or gene-technology implants in the new field of "surgical tomography".

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D H Groenemeyer, R M Seibel, A Melzer, A Schmidt. 1995. Image-guided access techniques.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7757444/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Diagnosis of lymphostatic edema of the extremities].

The diagnosis of lymphedema and its combination forms can be established with the aid of basic diagnostic measures (patient's medical history, inspection, palpation). Imaging techniques are indicated only when clinical examination falls to provide an unequivocal diagnosis, or when an accurate functional and morphological status of the disorder is required, for example in early stages of lymphedema and combination forms such as phlebolymphedema or lipolymphedema, etc. At present, the use of ultrasound, CT or MRI is of little value in the diagnosis of lymphedema of the extremities.

Diagnostic Imaging

Evidence-based diagnostic radiology.

The radiological community has a long track record of self-examination, starting well before evidence-based medicine came of age. It had to produce such evidence to prove the need for and win funds for its expensive gadgets. The assessment of new tests is easier than proving the value of well-established ones, and in scrutinising the evidence base for an imaging technique a balance must be struck between apparent (eg, diagnostic) benefit and real benefit to the patient. And even when there is a wealth of good evidence healthy debate continues. So radiology may be ahead of some other disciplines in considering the evidence for its daily practice. For example, where is the evidence for the routine clinical examination-and might the radiologist with a chest X-ray and abdominal ultrasound do better?

Diagnostic Imaging