PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7762802

DNA preparation from cryopreserved bone marrow cell samples.

Abstract

1. Quickly thaw cryopreserved MNCs (1 ml) in 9 ml PBS supplemented with DNase I immediately before use (final concentration: 0.1 mg/ml). 2. Incubate at 37 degrees C for 10 min. 3. Wash twice in PBS supplemented with 2% human AB serum at 4 degrees C. 4. Incubate with saturating amounts of selected MoAbs for 20 min at 4 degrees C. 5. Wash twice in PBS supplemented with 2% human AB serum at 4 degrees C. 6. Immunomagnetic bead separation of viable cells as described by Lea et al. (1). 7. DNA extraction. 8. Measure quality and yield of DNA by spectrophotometry. In conclusion, the DNA extraction method presented here, based on DNase I pretreatment of the cryopreserved cells followed by an immunological selection for viable cells, provides cell suspensions with close to 100% viability; thus, high-quality DNA can be extracted even from cryopreserved cell samples of low initial viability. Furthermore, using this method DNA analyses can be performed on selected cellular subsets if desired. We thus recommend this method for DNA analyses in hematological research when the only materials available are cryopreserved bone marrow samples of low viability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Jørgensen, P Hokland, E L Petersen, M Hokland. 1995-03-01. DNA preparation from cryopreserved bone marrow cell samples.. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1995.1165

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Single cell mutational analysis of PIK3CA in circulating tumor cells and metastases in breast cancer reveals heterogeneity, discordance, and mutation persistence in cultured disseminated tumor cells from bone marrow.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic decisions in cancer are generally guided by molecular biomarkers or, for some newer therapeutics, primary tumor genotype. However, because biomarkers or genotypes may change as new metastases emerge, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood are being investigated for a role in guiding real-time drug selection during disease progression, expecting that CTCs will comprehensively represent the full spectrum of genomic changes in metastases. However, information is limited regarding mutational heterogeneity among CTCs and metastases in breast cancer as discerned by single cell analysis. The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow also carry prognostic significance in breast cancer, but with variability between CTC and DTC detection. Here we analyze a series of single tumor cells, CTCs, and DTCs for PIK3CA mutations and report CTC and corresponding metastatic genotypes. METHODS: We used the MagSweeper, an immunomagnetic separation device, to capture live single tumor cells from breast cancer patients' primary and metastatic tissues, blood, and bone marrow. Single cells were screened for mutations in exons 9 and 20 of the PIK3CA gene. Captured DTCs grown in cell culture were also sequenced for PIK3CA mutations. RESULTS: Among 242 individual tumor cells isolated from 17 patients and tested for mutations, 48 mutated tumor cells were identified in three patients. Single cell analyses revealed mutational heterogeneity among CTCs and tumor cells in tissues. In a patient followed serially, there was mutational discordance between CTCs, DTCs, and metastases, and among CTCs isolated at different time points. DTCs from this patient propagated in vitro contained a PIK3CA mutation, which was maintained despite morphological changes during 21 days of cell culture. CONCLUSIONS: Single cell analysis of CTCs can demonstrate genotypic heterogeneity, changes over time, and discordance from DTCs and distant metastases. We present a cautionary case showing that CTCs from any single blood draw do not always reflect metastatic genotype, and that CTC and DTC analyses may provide independent clinical information. Isolated DTCs remain viable and can be propagated in culture while maintaining their original mutational status, potentially serving as a future resource for investigating new drug therapies.

Bone Marrow↗

Trisomy 8 as sole cytogenetic abnormality in a case of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

A 49-year-old man, who had been diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in 2002, had a normal karyotype in his bone marrow. Trisomy 8 was demonstrated in his peripheral blood in 2005. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using an LSI CEP 8 probe performed on the archival bone marrow specimen showed three hybridization signals in 40% of 200 interphase cells scored. This confirmed that the trisomy 8 abnormality was present in both the blood and bone marrow samples. Trisomy 8 as the sole chromosomal abnormality in CLL is a very rare finding. The prognostic significance of trisomy 8 in CLL remains to be seen.

Bone Marrow↗