PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7767020

Keratoconus.

Abstract

Keratoconus is characterized by the presence of corneal distortion (secondary to thinning of the apex) and either Fleischer's ring (found in 57% of patients) or Vogt's striae (found in 44% of patients). Often the only presenting symptom is decreased visual acuity. Steep keratometric readings are not usually diagnostic; 18% of patients with keratoconus have readings flatter than 45.00 D. Treatment requires correction of acuity with spectacles or contact lenses. More advanced cases are generally managed with rigid gas-permeable contact lenses. Corneal scarring occurs in approximately 43% of cases; 10% to 20% of patients require penetrating keratoplasty to restore acuity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T B Edrington, K Zadnik, J T Barr. 1995. Keratoconus.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7767020/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Lasers, optical systems and safety in ophthalmology: a review.

This is a review of optical methods related to biomicroscopy and laser treatment of the posterior segment of the eye. Contact lenses can be used to observe optical structures and couple laser radiation into the eye for a vast range of conditions and techniques. A small laser spot size is indispensable for photodisruptive work, though this requires a large beam diameter at the pupil and therefore optical systems and techniques such as scleral indentation which maximize the pupillary beam diameter are preferred. For coagulation work the choice of beam focusing optics is crucial for optimum safety. Vitreous replacement can be used to change the refractive power of the eye and permit new combinations of treatment and optical systems. This review covers many aspects of laser irradiation of the eye. It should be clear that, with the multitude of different procedures and optical systems involved, the laser surgeon is faced with a daunting task in assessing and meeting safety limits.

Contact Lenses

Optic disc height measurement with the Zeiss 4-mirror contact lens and 78 dioptre lens compared.

Measurements of optic disc diameter with the Zeiss 4-mirror contact lens and 78 dioptre (D) lens, made by projecting a slit-beam of known height onto the image of the disc, were compared with planimetric measurements in 30 eyes. The 78 D lens measurements were significantly larger than both the Zeiss lens and planimetric measurements (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0047 respectively). The measurements using the Zeiss lens and planimetry did not differ significantly. Compared with planimetry, for the 24 eyes within 3 D of emmetropia, the correlation was greater for the Zeiss (r = 0.8591) than for the 78 D lens (r = 0.7148). The Zeiss lens also showed better agreement and less scatter of results compared with the 78 D lens (standard error of the mean +/- 0.0373 mm for the Zeiss and +/- 0.0418 mm for the 78 D lens). The Zeiss contact lens measurements of optic disc diameter show stronger correlation and better agreement with planimetry than measurements using a 78 D lens.

Contact Lenses

[Contact glass tonometer].

BACKGROUND: This paper presents a tonometer built into a contactlens, which allows to measure the eye-pressure and to perform ophthalmoscopy at the same time. Artificially induced changes of the eye-pressure and their influence on the visible fundus can now be checked simultaneously. The contactlens-tonometer (CGT) also is able to record continuously the pulse-curve, which can indicate any circulatory problem. So, the device is expected to give us additional diagnostic criteria of early glaucoma. Each ophthalmologyst in the field will be able to perform with this device a oculodynamometry in an easy way. By this it is possible to estimate the pressure-tolerance of the optic disk from glaucoma-patients. MEASUREMENTS: There have been taken some measurements on enucleated human eyes, comparing our device with a Statham-transducer in the vitreous. We found a good correlation. In a second step, we made measurements (65) on healthy volunteers, comparing the device with Perkins-Tonometry. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found a correlation (R = 0.58). The error of the measurements was about +/- 3 mm Hg. Considering both, the deviation of the Perkins-Tonometer with which our results were compared, and the fact of a good correlation (R = 0.999) in the study with the enucleated human eyes, we found that the contact-lens-tonometer measures the intraocular pressure exactly. In future studies, we want to analyze the dynamic component of the measurements.

Contact Lenses