PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7785759

[Controlled hypotension].

Abstract

Induced hypotension is defined as a reduction in mean arterial blood pressure to 50-60 mm Hg in normotensive subjects. The aim of induced hypotension is to decrease intraoperative blood loss, decrease the need for blood transfusions and improve operating conditions. Most studies indicate that induced hypotension can decrease intraoperative blood loss by 50% in many surgical procedures; however, some studies report that blood loss is not significantly reduced. Current methods of induced hypotension are based on the use of rapid and short-acting vasodilators as primary agents (nitroprusside, nitroglycerine, urapidil), supplemented by volatile anesthetics (isoflurane) and/or beta-blockers (esmolol) to improve effect, reduce dosage and prevent side effects (reflex tachycardia, tachyphylaxis, rebound hypertension). Proper positioning of the patient and controlled ventilation aid in reducing blood loss. Major risks of induced hypotension are a reduction in blood flow (i.e. ischaemia) of vital organs (brain, myocardium) and elevation of intracranial pressure in neurosurgical patients. Thus, major contraindications of induced hypotension are severe coronary artery disease, hypertension combined with arteriosclerosis of cerebral vessels and increased intracranial pressure in patients with cerebral disease. Complications are rare in otherwise healthy patients, but may be higher in elderly patients and those with underlying organ dysfunction. Therefore, careful assessment and selection of patients, together with consideration of the potential complications, appropriate choice of drugs and invasive beat-by-beat monitoring, are essential for the safe practice of induced hypotension.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Larsen, S Kleinschmidt. 1995. [Controlled hypotension].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001010050157

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Quantitative EEG in assessment of anesthesia depth. Methods of comparison].

Methodology for assessment of depth of anaesthesia based on analysis of the electroencephalogram (eeg) is controversial. Techniques range from display of single measures, for example median value of the frequency spectrum, to dedicated pattern recognition systems based on measures of several eeg features. We have compared the performance of four techniques using tape-recorded data from 23 patients anaesthetised with either halothane or isoflurane using standardised regimens. The techniques were: median frequency, spectral edge frequency, the cerebral function analysing monitor (CFAM-1) and a depth of anaesthesia monitor based on eeg pattern recognition (ADAM). Dose-response curves are presented for stepwise increases in stable end-tidal concentrations of each agent. Results indicated considerable inter-patient variability and showed the limitations of single eeg measures, particularly with deeper anaesthesia producing burst suppression patterns in the eeg. Pattern recognition techniques reduced these difficulties and appeared to be promising over a wide range of anaesthetic levels.

Anesthesia