PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7786116

[Does syndrome X exist?].

Abstract

The syndrome X is an entity characterised by the association of chest pain on exercise and a positive exercise stress test in patients with normal coronary angiography. However, this diagnosis can only be admitted when all other causes of angina with normal coronary arteries have been excluded. They include angina secondary to coronary artery spasm and myocardial hypertrophy. A review of the literature based on 26 publications recensing 822 patients shows that these criteria are not always respected: a really positive exercise stress test is an inclusion criterion in only 13 studies and concerns only 313 patients (38.1%); myocardial hypertrophy and coronary spasm were formally excluded in only 278 (33.3%) and 228 patients (27.7%) respectively. Taking into consideration only the patients of these 26 series with a positive exercise stress test after exclusion of coronary spasm and myocardial hypertrophy, 143 (17.4%) may be considered to be due to syndrome X. Syndrome X is a real entity but its incidence is usually overestimated. It is appropriate to distinguish it from other conditions associating, though the exercise stress test is negative, chest pain on effort and the positivity of a test considered to be indicative of myocardial ischaemia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Bory. 1994. [Does syndrome X exist?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7786116/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Exercise rehabilitation programs for the treatment of claudication pain. A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the components of exercise rehabilitation programs that were most effective in improving claudication pain symptoms in patients with peripheral arterial disease. DATA SOURCES: English-language articles were identified by a computer search using Index Medicus and MEDLINE, followed by an extensive bibliography review. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they provided the mean or individual walking distances or times to the onset of claudication pain and to maximal pain during a treadmill test before and after rehabilitation. DATA EXTRACTION: Walking distances and times and characteristics of the exercise programs were independently abstracted by two observers. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty-three English-language studies were identified, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, following a program of exercise rehabilitation, the distance (mean +/- SD) to onset of claudication pain increased 179% from 125.9 +/- 57.3 m to 351.2 +/- 188.7 m (P < .001), and the distance to maximal claudication pain increased 122% from 325.8 +/- 148.1 m to 723.3 +/- 591.5 m (P < .001). The greatest improvement in pain distances occurred with the following exercise program: duration greater than 30 minutes per session, frequency of at least three sessions per week, walking used as the mode of exercise, use of near-maximal pain during training as claudication pain end point, and program length of greater than 6 months. However, the claudication pain end point, program length, and mode of exercise were the only independent predictors (P < .001) for improvement in distances. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal exercise program for improving claudication pain distances in patients with peripheral arterial disease uses intermittent walking to near-maximal pain during a program of at least 6 months. Such a program should be part of the standard medical care for patients with intermittent claudication.

Exercise Test