PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7787193

The ICIDH: evolution, status, and prospects.

Abstract

The assessment of disability prevalence in populations is a long-standing concern. In the mid-1970s the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced a scheme for the measurement of the consequences of disease. The classification of the long-term non-fatal consequences of disease is structured on three axes, corresponding roughly to experiences at the level of organ or function (impairment--1009 items), individual action (disability--338 items) and societal interaction (handicap/disadvantage--72 items). The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps (ICIDH) is now well established. This paper describes developments in the use of the ICIDH since 1980, in assessing the prevalence of disability in populations, in formulating policy decisions, in management at institution level, and in the care of individuals. It lists problems identified in the use of the ICIDH, such as the need to clarify the role and interrelationship of environmental factors in the definition and development of the different planes addressed by the ICIDH, problems of overlap between disabilities and handicaps, and between impairments and disabilities. Suggestions for improvement include a greater emphasis on presenting handicap as a description of the interrelation between impairments or disabilities and their physical and social environment. It is anticipated that a revised proposal will be finalized for 1998 and formally issued in 1999.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M C Thuriaux. The ICIDH: evolution, status, and prospects.. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289509166705

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Methods of evaluation of musician's dystonia: critique of measurement tools.

Musician's dystonia is associated with significant morbidity. To assess treatment options, accurate and precise measurements of disease severity are critical. We describe current methods of quantitatively measuring musician's dystonia of the upper extremity including subjective, objective, and automated methods. The degree to which these methods satisfy rigorous measurement criteria, including their reliability, validity, responsiveness to treatment, and practicality, is examined. We report that most of these methods have not been properly evaluated. Therefore, treatment trials based on these methods are difficult to interpret.

Disability Evaluation↗

[Compensation for tinnitus in private accident insurance].

According to the provisions of private accident insurance, mental or psychic reactions are excluded from compensation. Until now, tinnitus was taken as fully psychic and therefore excluded. In two recently published judgments of the Federal Supreme Court in Germany the assessment of tinnitus in private accident insurance and particularly the exclusion clause section sign 2 Abs. 4 AUB 88 has been newly defined. According to this actual jurisdiction the compensation of tinnitus could be possible, when as physical underlying reason a proved harm in the inner ear or the auditory pathway (hearing loss), which can be traced back to the accident according to the rules of causality. This leads to the question how Tinnitus could be compensated without modification of the general terms and conditions of the private accident insurance. A compensating table is proposed, which recognizes the somatic (physical) part of tinnitus and is based on medical and scientific findings of the relation between hearing loss and tinnitus.

Disability Evaluation↗