PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7790259

Tissue compensation using dynamic collimation on a linear accelerator.

H E Gaballa·G Mitev·R D Zwicker·J Y Ting·O F Tercilla
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: The availability of computer-controlled collimators on some accelerators has led to techniques for dynamic beam modification, mainly to simulate beam wedge filters. This work addresses the practical aspects of dynamic tissue compensation in one dimension using available treatment-planning software. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data derived from the treatment-planning program is used with an iterative calculational routine to determine the monitor unit settings needed for the collimator-controlling computer. The method was first tested by simulating a 60 degrees physical wedge. Further studies were carried out on a specially fabricated plastic phantom that modeled the sagittal contour of the upper torso, neck, and lower head regions. RESULTS: Dynamic wedge point doses generated by the planning program agreed within 1% with the values directly measured in a polystyrene phantom. In the patient phantom, dynamic collimation achieved calculated dose uniformity within 0.5% in a reference plane near the phantom midline. A comparison of computer-generated and measured point doses in this case showed agreement within 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic collimation can provide effective compensation for contours that vary primarily along one direction. A conventional treatment-planning program can be used to plan dynamic collimation and deliver a prescribed dose with reliable accuracy.

Explore related subjects

Models, AnatomicParticle AcceleratorsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Computer-AssistedJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H E Gaballa, G Mitev, R D Zwicker, J Y Ting, O F Tercilla. 1995-06-15. Tissue compensation using dynamic collimation on a linear accelerator.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00593-a

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1996

Use of a 1 mm collimator to test the accuracy of stereotactic radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To develop a method of measuring locations of the center of dose in stereotactic radiotherapy relative to the center of the target, and thereby obtain a test of the accuracy of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: An insert was mounted in an SRT collimator on a 6 MV linear accelerator to provide a photon beam approximately 1 mm in diameter at isocenter, and a method of measuring radiation center coordinates of arced SRT beams. To simulate a small intracranial target, two halves of a Barium paste column were embedded in two adjacent slabs of a humanoid phantom. A film was placed between the slabs to image the radiation relative to the target center. A surgical head ring and computerized tomography (CT) localizer were attached to the phantom and CT scans were obtained. The scans were entered in a three-dimensional computerized treatment-planning system and radiation isocenter coordinates determined by iteratively moving the 90% isodose surface center of arced beam dose distributions to coincide with the target center. The phantom was bolted to an SRT floorstand with isocenter coordinates obtained from the treatment plan, and then irradiated in two sets of experiments. The first set applied five 1 mm noncoplanar arced beams with and without offsets of the planned coordinates in the transverse plane. The second set applied one large transverse arc coplanar to the film with and without offsets in the craniocaudal direction. Irradiations with coordinate offsets tested the sensitivity of the method. Films were developed and digitized with a high resolution film scanner to measure the location of the radiation relative to the target center. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The radiation center was found from 0.0 to 0.3 mm of the target center, within requirements of our clinical quality assurance program. The measurement and evaluation of coincidence of radiation and target centers are, thus, proposed as elements of radiosurgery facility acceptance and annual quality assurance.

Models, Anatomic↗
PubMed1996

Transmission dosimetry with a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of transmission dose rate measurements for various phantom-detector geometries, performed with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and to compare these transmission dose rate values with exit dose rate data. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Transmission dose rate values on the central beam axis and beam profiles were measured with an EPID consisting of a matrix of liquid-filled ionization chambers. These data were compared with transmission and exit dose rate values, obtained using air-filled ionization chambers for a number of field sizes, phantom thickness, and phantom-detector distances. Various homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantoms were applied. RESULTS: The increase in dose rate with field size is larger for the EPID than in air, due to the larger amount of side scatter in the EPID. The difference has been taken into account by a deconvolution of the EPID images. An additional build-up layer on top of the commercial device is needed to reach dose maximum at the liquid ionization chambers for photon beam energies higher than about 4 MV. The transmission off-axis ratios (OAR) determined with the EPID and in air agreed within 2% for all tested cases, after deconvolution of the EPID signal. The agreement between the EPID-and exit-OAR decreased with increasing phantom-detector distance and the presence of inhomogeneities. For a phantom-detector distance of about 10 cm, the EPID- and exit-OARs agree within 2.5%. The difference could be up to 8% for an air inhomogeneity and a phantom-detector distance of 30 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between EPID measurements and measurements in air can be explained by side scatter effects in the EPID and lack of adequate buildup, and can easily be taken into account. The loss of scatter compared with the situation at the exit side of the phantom explains the difference between transmission and exit dose values. At short phantom-detector distances, good agreement exists between transmission and exit dose rate. This implies that at this distance, the EPID can be used for simple comparison with exit dose calculations during patient treatments. At larger distances, more sophisticated conversion methods are required.

Models, Anatomic↗
PubMed1993

Correction of phase aberrations for sectored annular array ultrasound transducers.

Two methods for correction of unknown phase aberrations induced by inhomogeneous acoustic velocities in tissues are explored for the two dimensional geometry of a sectored annular array system. The methods employed are adaptations of a cross correlation technique and a speckle brightness maximization technique. The methods correct phase distortions via the introduction of phase shifts in the timing sequence at the beamformer stage of a sectored annular array transducer. The techniques are investigated employing software models and a computer controlled automated scanning system. A 65-element sectored annular array is modelled via a rotating 5 element transducer. Tissue equivalent materials were moulded into a double layer aberrating medium to simulate phase distortions encountered in the rectus abdominis muscle in vivo. A comparison of the effectiveness of the two correction methods is presented. Contrast of an anechoic region is increased from 0.34 +/- 0.08 to 0.48 +/- 0.06 for the cross correlation technique, and up to 0.62 +/- 0.05 for the speckle brightness maximization method. The performance of these correction techniques on target phantoms suggests that considerable improvements in image quality should be possible for clinical systems.

Models, Anatomic↗