PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7804642

Recent and current EPA good laboratory practice policy issues.

Abstract

The Policy and Grants Division of the Office of Compliance Monitoring and specifically the Pesticides Enforcement Policy Branch (PEPB) of that division were active in policy issues affecting GLPs throughout the past year. Among the products have been a number of correspondences which have been made available to the regulated community--edited to preserve the confidentiality of persons writing to the agency--as "advisories." In addition, the PEPB actively worked with members of the regulated community to assist in their compliance with the GLPs. These two areas, GLP policy guidance during the last year and compliance-assistance efforts, are discussed below. Note that recently there have been organizational changes at EPA, and policy issues originally covered by the Pesticides Enforcement Policy Branch are now addressed by the new Agriculture Branch of the Agriculture and Ecosystems Division. This division is in the Office of Compliance of the newly formed Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. This organizational change will not adversely affect EPA responsiveness on GLP policy matters.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S J Howie. 1994. Recent and current EPA good laboratory practice policy issues.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7804642/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Retained foreign bodies from the view of the OR nurse].

Patient safety in the operating room is of high priority for the surgical team and for all healthcare workers involved. Counting procedures contribute to minimizing potential risks for the patients, especially in preventing them from leaving the operating room with retained, unintended foreign bodies. A total of 64% of operating room nurses involved in a survey are reported as having been involved in a surgical procedure in which the correct count prevented foreign bodies from being left in the patient. In addition, the strengths and potential weak points of the counting procedures could be identified. The results of the survey and drafts for a standard counting control as well as procedural recommendations are presented for discussion. A recommendation can be provided for each surgical department in order to check their own counting methods for avoiding potential risks.

Documentation↗