PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7810576

Psychiatric genetics: research challenges and pathways forward.

Abstract

Lessons from past psychiatric genetic research, together with key issues in psychiatry requiring genetic investigation, are reviewed in order to consider the implications for the ways forward. It is argued that traditional quantitative genetics needs to use a combination of twin, adoptee, and family strategies, to examine continuities and discontinuities in psychopathology between childhood and adult life, to compare dimensions and categories, to employ adequate conceptualization and measurement of disorders, to use statistical techniques based on latent constructs, to use biological trait indicators where possible, to examine risk factors as well as diseases, to include good measures of postulated environmental risk variables, to study the interplay between genes and environment, and to study the key assumptions underlying genetic strategies. Molecular cytogenetics needs to consider both the general and specific psychopathological risks associated with chromosome abnormalities and to examine the mechanism involved, to examine the role of submicroscopic chromosomal deletions and of mitochondrial disorders, and to investigate the mechanisms involved in trinucleotide repeat amplifications that take place during intergenerational transmission. Molecular genetics needs to make greater use of smaller pedigrees in view of the concerns over phenotypic definition and genetic heterogeneity in very large extended dense pedigrees, to use sib-pair designs in view of the likelihood that most psychiatric disorder will prove to be multifactorial, to combine association strategies with linkage analyses, to pay careful attention to the definition of phenotypes in probands, to remain in close touch with other branches of biological psychiatry, and to make effective use of collaboration between centers. To date, transgenic models have had a rather limited application in psychiatry but, despite their difficulties, they are likely to provide an underpinning for gene therapy in disorders where that seems feasible.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Rutter. 1994-09-15. Psychiatric genetics: research challenges and pathways forward.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320540305

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Nested, non-parametric, correlative analysis of microarrays for heterogenous phenotype characterization.

We present a non-parametric approach for qualitatively selecting candidate genes to characterize several criteria that are nested among genes selected on the basis of their individual, similar effects upon an array-wide closeness measure. In this setting, a goal is to obtain a reliable characterization of phenotypes, based on very high-dimensional data from a few samples. As opposed to a distance-based approach, the proposed measure defines closeness based on gene signal profiles (functionals) rather than on isolated (numerical) differences in each gene between samples. By using such a measure to characterize intensity differences, we effectively separate biological from artifactual variation in expression, due to tissue effects or signal calibration. Based on this measure, we successively examine the significance of the following: a set of similarly behaved genes relative to all arrayed genes, a set of candidate genes relative to similarly behaved genes, individual candidate genes relative to non-candidates, and the direction, as over- or under-expressed, of candidate genes. In each setting, sample pairs are the units of analysis, with U-statistics the theoretical framework. We illustrate the method on a microarray experiment, where the goal is to select sets of genes that characterize a type of skin cancer and its histological subtypes.

Genetic Heterogeneity↗

Subtyping schizophrenia: implications for genetic research.

Phenotypic variability and likely extensive genetic heterogeneity have been confounding the search for the causes of schizophrenia since the inception of the diagnostic category. The inconsistent results of genetic linkage and association studies using the diagnostic category as the sole schizophrenia phenotype suggest that the current broad concept of schizophrenia does not demarcate a homogeneous disease entity. Approaches involving subtyping and stratification by covariates to reduce heterogeneity have been successful in the genetic study of other complex disorders, but rarely applied in schizophrenia research. This article reviews past and present attempts at delineating schizophrenia subtypes based on clinical features, statistically derived measures, putative genetic indicators, and intermediate phenotypes, highlighting the potential utility of multidomain neurocognitive endophenotypes.

Genetic Heterogeneity↗

Testing for genetic heterogeneity in the genome search meta-analysis method.

The Genome Search Meta-Analysis (GSMA) method is widely used to detect linkage by pooling results of previously published genome-wide linkage studies. The GSMA uses a non-parametric summed rank statistic in 30 cM bins of the genome. Zintzaras and Ioannidis ([2005] Genet. Epidemiol. 28:123-137) developed a method of testing for heterogeneity of evidence for linkage in the GSMA, with three heterogeneity statistics (Q, Ha, B). They implement two testing procedures, restricted versus unrestricted for the summed rank within the bin. We show here that the rank-unrestricted test provides a conservative test for high heterogeneity and liberal test for low heterogeneity in linked regions. The rank-restricted test should therefore be used, despite the extensive simulations needed. In a simulation study, we show that the power to detect heterogeneity is low. For 20 studies of affected sib pairs, simulated assuming linkage in all studies to a gene with sibling relative risk of 1.3, the power to detect low heterogeneity using the Q statistic was 14%. With linkage present in 50% of the studies (to a gene with sibling relative risk of 1.4), the Q heterogeneity statistic had power of 29% to detect high heterogeneity. The power to detect linkage using the summed rank was high in both of these situations, at 98% and 79%, respectively. Although testing for heterogeneity in the GSMA is of interest, the currently available method provides little additional information to that provided by the summed rank statistic.

Genetic Heterogeneity↗