PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7811404

Imaging after titanium cranioplasty.

Abstract

Titanium cranioplasty has been used in our unit for reconstruction of cranial defects following trauma, tumour resection and bone loss due to postcraniotomy infection. It has previously been assumed that imaging to assess recurrence of disease progression after cranioplasty would be severely compromised in the presence of metallic material. Titanium is a non-ferrous metal of low atomic number, which is relatively radiolucent and allows exceptionally clear images to be obtained without significant degradation of image quality, on CT and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Cases are presented that demonstrate the use of CT contrast cisternography and MR imaging after titanium cranioplasty. On the basis of its strength, biocompatibility and excellent handling characteristics, allied to its suitability for all post-operative imaging techniques, we conclude that titanium plate is the material of choice for cranioplasty.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C L Chandler, D Uttley, D J Archer, D MacVicar. 1994. Imaging after titanium cranioplasty.. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688699408995107

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A penalized likelihood approach to magnetic resonance image reconstruction.

Currently, images acquired via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology are reconstructed using the discrete inverse Fourier transform. While computationally convenient, this approach is not able to filter out noise. This is a serious limitation because the amount of noise in MRI and fMRI can be substantial. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach to reconstruction, based on penalized likelihood methodology. In particular, we focus on non-linear shrinkage estimators and show that this approach achieves a great reduction in integrated mean squared error (IMSE) of the estimated image with respect to the currently used estimator. This approach is extremely fast and easy to implement computationally. In addition, it can be combined with various alternative approaches to MR image reconstruction and can be easily adapted to other, non-MRI contexts, in which the observed data and the quantities of interest are related via a linear transform.

Brain Diseases↗