PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7812684

An inversion algorithm for determining area-source emissions from downwind concentration measurements.

M Lehning·D R Shonnard·D P Chang·R L Bell
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Measuring emissions from nonuniform area sources, such as waste repository sites, has been a difficult problem. A simple but reliable method is not available. An objective method of inverting downwind concentration measurements, utilizing an assumed form of atmospheric dispersion to reconstruct total emission rate and distribution, is described in this study. The Gaussian dispersion model is compared to a more realistic model based on K-theory and similarity expressions. A sensitivity analysis is presented indicating the atmospheric conditions under which a successful application of the method could be anticipated. Field releases of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) from a simulated area source in flat terrain were conducted to check the method, ability to reconstruct source distribution, and total emission rate. The sensitivity analysis and the field study confirm that a few ground-level concentration measurements and a simple determination of the atmospheric dispersion characteristics are sufficient, under neutral to stable conditions, to obtain the total emission rate accurately. Reconstruction of the spatial pattern of the source is possible by utilizing concentration information from samplers located on two separate ground-level receptor lines, if a shift in the wind direction occurs and if it can be assumed that the total emission rate is time invariant. A method of cross-checking the accuracy of the reconstruction, using a simultaneous tracer release, is presented.

Explore related subjects

Air Pollutants, OccupationalAlgorithmsModels, TheoreticalJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Lehning, D R Shonnard, D P Chang, R L Bell. 1994. An inversion algorithm for determining area-source emissions from downwind concentration measurements.. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1994.10467315

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1995

[Exposure to anesthetic gases].

In recent years there has been a growing awareness of possible hazards caused by anaesthetic gases in operating theatres. Our study monitored ambient nitrous oxide (N2O) levels in the operating theatres and recovery rooms at the University Hospital in Tromsø. The results show that exposure to waste anaesthetic gases occurs because of leaks in the anaesthetic equipment. The three major sources of leaks are masks, high pressure fittings and exhalation valves. Prevention of leakage from equipment is very important, and a leakage testing programme should be an essential part of the daily control strategy. Good working practices and tracheal intubation results in low exposure to nitrous oxide in the breathing zone of the anesthetic personnel. During mask anaesthesia we have observed nitrous oxide concentrations above 1500 ppm, owing to mask leakage. A closely fitting scavenging mask and good working practices lead to in lower nitrous oxide concentrations. Nitrous oxide exhalation from the patient in the recovery room is only a minor problem.

Air Pollutants, Occupational↗
PubMed1995

Epidemiologic application of a dosimetric model of dust overload.

Evidence from laboratory animals suggests that certain rates of deposition of dust can slow the normal clearance of the lungs by macrophages. If this occurs in humans, then estimates of exposure or dose for epidemiologic models may be improved by explicity incorporating this "overload" phenomenon into lung dose estimates. Using a model of dust overload, the authors estimated the lung dust dose for a group of workers exposed to silicon carbide dust. From a knowledge of underlying biologic mechanisms and using goodness of fit tests, the authors identified parameters for the dosimetric model that yielded dose estimates which fit the epidemiologic data well. The dosimetric estimates also compare favorably with cumulative exposure as risk predictors of radiographic evidence of pulmonary fibrosis. The evidence for overload is not strong, however, since the data are also consistent with other clearance patterns including very slow linear one-compartment clearance. Nevertheless, in some data sets, use of a dosimetric model instead of cumulative exposure to dust may reduce misclassification in exposure and improve fit to epidemiologic data. Furthermore, evidence of a better fit would provide valuable information about biologic mechanisms or aspects of dose such as the effect of short-term, high-intensity exposures. These in turn might provide information about prevention strategies such as standard setting.

Air Pollutants, Occupational↗