PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7824480

[Quantifying dyspnea].

A Noseda·J C Yernault
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Several methods have been proposed in the recent years to quantitate dyspnoea in healthy subjects or patients. Dyspnoea can be serially assessed on exercise, using either a visual analogue scale or a Borg scale, and is usually analyzed in relation to ventilation, which defines a dyspnoea threshold and a dyspnoea/ventilation slope. Inhaled bronchodilators, oral morphine, continuous (or inspiratory) positive airway pressure or respiratory rehabilitation programmes are able to decrease the dyspnoea/ventilation slope in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, while atenolol and pneumectomy have a deleterious effect. Measurement of dyspnoea in everyday life is feasible using the oxygen cost diagram or the baseline dyspnoea index; these indices are responsive to therapy, e.g. to oral theophylline in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Dyspnoea measured at rest is a marker for evaluating the perception of added loads (open scale) or acute bronchoconstriction in normals or patients; in the latter it may also reflect the perception of the degree in baseline ventilatory impairment or that of acute bronchodilation (bipolar visual analogue scale). Some respiratory patients being poor perceivers, methods able to improve the perception of airway obstruction are desirable in these individuals.

Explore related subjects

Differential ThresholdDyspneaHumansPhysical ExertionPsychophysicsRespiratory Function TestsRestEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Noseda, J C Yernault. 1994-10-29. [Quantifying dyspnea].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7824480/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Across-object relationships in perceived object orientation.

An orientation discrimination paradigm was used to determine whether the perceived orientation of extended objects is based on the distribution of edge-orientations or on the response of mechanisms that encode relationships across the object; specifically we considered large, second-stage filters and cores (the perceived middle of the object) as encoders of the across-object relationship. The stimuli were "rectangles" with sinusoidally modulated long edges. Manipulating the frequency and relative phase of the edge modulation allowed us to assess the importance of the across-object relationships. Evidence was found for the importance of such relationships in determining perceived orientation. No evidence was found for direct use of the distribution of responding edge detectors.

Differential Threshold↗
PubMed1997

The perception of frequency peaks and troughs in wide frequency modulations. IV. Effects of modulation waveform.

This work extends previous studies on the perceptual asymmetry between the local maxima and minima of wide frequency modulations (FMs) [L. Demany and K. I. McAnally, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 706-715 (1994); L. Demany and S. Clément, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 2454-2459 (1995); L. Demany and S. Clément, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2515-2523 (1995)]. In experiment 1, subjects had to discriminate frequency shifts in the temporally central vertex of V- and A-shaped FMs imposed on 200-ms sinusoidal tone bursts. The precise shapes of these FMs varied in eight steps from quasi-triangles (with a durationless central vertex) to quasi-squares (with a long-duration central vertex). The central vertex was either a minimum or a maximum, but in each case the corresponding frequency was near 1000 Hz and the FM span was about 0.5 oct. For each FM shape, the discrimination threshold was lower when the vertex was a maximum than when it was a minimum, but (in four subjects out of five) this difference decreased monotonically as the FM became less and less triangular. FM shape had a remarkably small effect on the discrimination of the maxima, and the thresholds measured for the sharpest maxima were unexpectedly low. In subsequent experiments, subjects had to discriminate frequency shifts in the starting point or the final point of unidirectional FMs (tone glides) that spanned about 0.5 oct in 100 ms. The relevant frequency extremum was near 1000 Hz in each condition. At the final point of the glides, discrimination was better for rising glides than for falling glides. At the starting point of the glides, discrimination was better for falling glides than for rising glides. Thus discrimination was always better when the relevant frequency extremum was a maximum than when it was a minimum, and this effect was produced both "forward" and "backward." The latter fact suggests that the perceptual asymmetry of FM originates at least partly from central factors.

Differential Threshold↗
PubMed1997

Use of a decibel threshold in detecting Doppler embolic signals.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To improve reproducibility and reliability in the identification of embolic signals detected with the use of Doppler ultrasound, many studies have used an intensity threshold. However, variable thresholds between 3 and 12 dB have been used, and often the method of measurement of intensity is not stated. Potentially different methods of measurement could result in different intensity measurements for the same embolic signal. We determined the effect of these differences using commercial transcranial Doppler systems. METHODS: We analyzed 81 embolic signals recorded from the middle cerebral arteries of patients with carotid artery disease using three different methods of measuring intensity that had been previously used in research studies. In method 1 individual time frames of the frequency spectra were analyzed, in method 2 a color-coded intensity scale was used, and in method 3 automated software was used. RESULTS: There was a highly significant correlation between measurements made by the different techniques (method 1 versus method 2: r = .68, P < .0001; method 1 versus method 3: r = .66, P < .0001; method 2 versus method 3: r = .70, P < .0001). However, the absolute values of intensity for the same embolic signals varied markedly for the different methods. For example, a 4-dB threshold according to method 1 was equivalent to an approximately 7-dB threshold measured by method 2. These differences had major effects on the proportion of embolic signals detected with the use of the same decibel threshold but with intensity measured in the different ways. For example, using a threshold of 7 dB would result in only 4.9% of signals being missed by method 2 but 42.2% and 51.4% being missed by methods 1 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the intensities of the same embolic signals, recorded with the same parameters, are markedly different when analyzed in the different ways used in previous studies. This has important implications when a decibel threshold is used and emphasizes that criteria developed by one investigator on one machine cannot be used by another investigator without initial reevaluation. This could account for some of the differences in frequencies of embolic signals reported in previous clinical studies.

Differential Threshold↗