PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 782842

[Studies on the difference between habitual intercuspidation and redrograde contact position].

Abstract

In a study of a different subject, the difference between habitual intercuspidation and retral contact position was determined in 21 fully dentulous patients. Registration of the retral position of the mandible was performed by interocclusal wax records and the graphic method. In none of the probands, habitual intercuspidation and retral contact position coincided. In contrast to other authors, we found that siginificant differences between the two methods of registration are an explanation for the differences found betweeen the two positions of the mandible in the sagittal direction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Horn, A Vetter. 1976. [Studies on the difference between habitual intercuspidation and redrograde contact position].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/782842/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The influence of dental operating microscope in locating the mesiolingual canal orifice.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of using the dental operating microscope (DOM) for detection of the mesiolingual (ML) canal orifice in extracted maxillary molars compared with unaided vision (no loupes or headlamps). STUDY DESIGN: Using a clinical simulation model system, we mounted 39 maxillary molars in a dentoform and placed them into a mannequin. After rubber dam placement and preparation of standard access, 2 attempts were made to locate the ML canal with unaided vision. Then the teeth were examined by using a DOM. Finally, all teeth were sectioned, stained, and evaluated with the DOM for actual presence of an ML canal. RESULTS: ML canal orifices were detected in 20 of the teeth with a sharp explorer and mirror. In the remaining teeth, 12 ML canal orifice were located by using the DOM. Qualitative nonparametric comparisons were used. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the DOM provides increased opportunity for the dentist to detect canal orifices.

Dental Equipment↗