PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7828698

Inspiratory muscle testing in stable COPD patients.

Abstract

Exploration of inspiratory muscles in stable chronic pulmonary disease patients can be important in the investigation of a respiratory handicap unsatisfactorily explained by alterations of the passive respiratory system, or in the follow-up of patients undergoing treatments that can interfere with muscle function. Compensatory mechanisms tend to counterbalance the deleterious effects of hyperinflation in these patients, and precise clinical data are needed in order to avoid mistakes due to underverified hypotheses. Investigation of inspiratory muscle function requires the study of output data under various states of activity of the system. As outputs, volume displacement lacks specificity, pressure measurements can be more specific but are at times invasive and should be associated with lung volume measurements, electromyography is methodologically complex, nonquantitative and of poor reproducibility. Voluntary manoeuvres depend upon subject co-operation, and do not allow partitioning of output between the action of different muscle groups. Transcutaneous electrical phrenic nerve stimulation is devoid of these inconveniences, but it explores only one muscle (the diaphragm) under conditions that are not "natural" (relaxed rib cage). Recently, perspectives for easier clinical assessment of inspiratory muscle function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients have been opened by cervical magnetic stimulation, better understanding of the meaning of mouth pressure in relationship to phrenic stimulation, and development of noninvasive tests, such as nostril pressure during sniff or phonomyography. If validated, such tests should provide a reasonably limited panel of clinical tools to better appreciate muscle function in this setting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Similowski, J P Derenne. 1994. Inspiratory muscle testing in stable COPD patients.. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.94.07101871

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Tumor and normal tissue motion in the thorax during respiration: Analysis of volumetric and positional variations using 4D CT.

PURPOSE: To investigate temporospatial variations of tumor and normal tissue during respiration in lung cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 14 patients, gross tumor volume (GTV) and normal tissue structures were manually contoured on four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) scans. Structures were evaluated for volume changes, centroid (center of mass) motion, and phase dependence of variations relative to inspiration. Only volumetrically complete structures were used for analysis (lung in 2, heart in 8, all other structures in >10 patients). RESULTS: During respiration, the magnitude of contoured volumes varied up to 62.5% for GTVs, 25.5% for lungs, and 12.6% for hearts. The range of maximum three-dimensional centroid movement for individual patients was 1.3-24.0 mm for GTV, 2.4-7.9 mm for heart, 5.2-12.0 mm for lungs, 0.3-5.5 mm for skin markers, 2.9-10.0 mm for trachea, and 6.6-21.7 mm for diaphragm. During respiration, the centroid positions of normal structures varied relative to the centroid position of the respective GTV by 1.5-8.1 mm for heart, 2.9-9.3 mm for lungs, 1.2-9.2 mm for skin markers, 0.9-7.1 mm for trachea, and 2.7-16.4 mm for diaphragm. CONCLUSION: Using 4D-CT, volumetric changes, positional alterations as well as changes in the position of contoured structures relative to the GTV were observed with large variations between individual patients. Although the interpretation of 4D-CT data has considerable uncertainty because of 4D-CT artifacts, observer variations, and the limited acquisition time, the findings might have a significant impact on treatment planning.

Diaphragm↗

Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician.

PURPOSE: To review established techniques and to provide an update on new methods for clinical monitoring of neuromuscular function relevant to anesthesia. SOURCE: A PubMed search of relevant article for the period 1985-2005 was undertaken, and bibliographies were scanned for additional sources. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: There is no substitute for objective neuromuscular monitoring; for research purposes, mechanomyography (MMG) is the gold standard; however, the most versatile method in the clinical setting is acceleromyography since it can be applied at various muscles and has a long track record of clinical utility. Kinemyography is valid to monitor recovery of neuromuscular transmission at the adductor pollicis muscle (AP), whereas phonomyography is easy to apply to various muscles and shows promising agreement with MMG. Monitoring of the corrugator supercilii muscle (CS) may be used to determine the earliest time for tracheal intubation as it reflects laryngeal relaxation better than monitoring at the AP. Recovery of neuromuscular transmission is best monitored at the AP, since it is the last muscle to recover from neuromuscular blockade (NMB). If train-of-four (TOF) stimulation is used, a TOF-ratio > 0.9 should be the target before awakening the patient. If surgery or the type of anesthesia necessitates NMB of a certain degree, e.g., TOF-ratio = 0.25, monitoring of muscles which best reflect the degree of NMB at the surgical site is preferable. CONCLUSION: Objective methods should be used to monitor neuromuscular function in clinical anesthesia. Acceleromyography offers the best compromise with respect to ease of use, practicality, versatility, precision and applicability at various muscles. The CS is the optimal muscle to determine the earliest time for intubation, e.g., for rapid sequence induction.

Diaphragm↗