PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7844240

Visual evoked potentials.

M J Aminoff·D S Goodin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The recording of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) is an important means of obtaining reproducible, quantitative data on the function of the anterior visual pathways. In this review, the technical aspects of recording VEPs are briefly discussed, components of the VEPs are described, and the clinical uses of VEPs are considered. It is concluded that VEPs are useful in providing information concerning the functional integrity of the anterior visual pathways. They are especially useful in evaluating patients with visual symptoms but no objective findings on examination and in patients without visual symptoms but with diseases that are known to involve the visual pathways commonly and subclinically. Lastly, the utility and limitations of VEPs in various neurological disorders are summarized, bearing in mind the widespread availability of advanced neuroimaging techniques.

Explore related subjects

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsBrain Damage, ChronicDominance, CerebralEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansOccipital LobeVision DisordersVisual PathwaysJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Aminoff, D S Goodin. 1994. Visual evoked potentials.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199409000-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Phase locking to high frequencies in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl, Tyto alba.

The auditory system of the barn owl is an important model for temporal processing on a very fast time scale and for the neural mechanisms and circuitry underlying sound localization. Phase locking has been shown to be the behaviorally relevant temporal code. This study examined the quality and intensity dependence of phase locking in single auditory nerve fibers of the barn owl to define the input to the known brainstem circuit for temporal processing. For direct comparison in the same individuals, recordings were also obtained from the relevant next higher center, the nucleus magnocellularis (NM). Phase locking was regularly seen at sound pressure levels (SPL) below those eliciting an increase in spike rate, thus providing an additional cue for signal detection. The quality of phase locking, expressed as vector strength, decreased with increasing frequency. Auditory nerve fibers showed an unusual step-like decline with a prominent plateau in the mid-frequency range (1.5-3 kHz), indicating that some specialization enables the owl to halt the deterioration and extend phase locking to frequencies up to 10 kHz, above the range commonly observed in other species. Phase locking in the NM was consistently inferior to that of auditory-nerve fibers at frequencies above 1 kHz, suggesting that the synapse plays a limiting role in temporal precision. The response delays, or group delays, derived from the phase-versus-frequency functions of auditory nerve fibers were not consistent with the unusual spatial frequency representation in the owl cochlea. This questions the common assumption that group delays reflect cochlear wave travel times.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1997

The audiogenic startle reflex in Tourette's syndrome.

The motor response pattern of the audiogenic startle reflex was studied in 15 Tourette's syndrome (TS) patients and 15 normal, age-matched control subjects, using auditory stimuli at 88 and 114 dB. The louder stimuli readily elicited responses in the orbicularis oculi (in all subjects), masseter, sternomastoid, trapezius, deltoid, and biceps (in most subjects) muscles, with a few subjects having responses in the forearm flexors and quadriceps. The TS subjects did not differ from controls in the onset latency, amplitude, and first peak latency of the reflex response in any of the muscles. Rates of habituation in the orbicularis oculi muscle were widely variable across the subjects, and the two groups did not differ overall in the habituation rates. Our study does not support the reports of an abnormal audiogenic startle reflex in TS.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1997

Development of multisensory neurons and multisensory integration in cat superior colliculus.

The development of multisensory neurons and multisensory integration was examined in the deep layers of the superior colliculus of kittens ranging in age from 3 to 135 d postnatal (dpn). Despite the high proportion of multisensory neurons in adult animals, no such neurons were found during the first 10 d of postnatal life. Rather, all sensory-responsive neurons were unimodal. The first multisensory neurons (somatosensory-auditory) were found at 12 dpn, and visually responsive multisensory neurons were not found until 20 dpn. Early multisensory neurons responded weakly to sensory stimuli, had long latencies, large receptive fields, and poorly developed response selectivities. Most surprising, however, was their inability to integrate combinations of sensory cues to produce significant response enhancement (or depression), a characteristic feature of the adult. Responses to combinations of sensory cues differed little from responses to their modality-specific components. At 28 dpn an abrupt physiological change was noted. Some multisensory neurons now integrated combinations of cross-modality cues and exhibited significant response enhancements when these cues were spatially coincident and response depressions when the cues were spatially disparate. During the next 2 months the incidence of multisensory neurons, and the proportion of these neurons capable of adult-like multisensory integration, gradually increased. Once multisensory integration appeared in a given neuron, its properties changed little with development. Even the youngest integrating neurons showed superadditive enhancements and spatial characteristics of multisensory integration that were indistinguishable from the adult. Nevertheless, neonatal and adult multisensory neurons differed in the manner in which they integrated temporally asynchronous stimuli, a distribution that may reflect the very different behavioral requirements at different ages. The possible maturational role of corticotectal projections in the abrupt gating of multisensory integration is discussed.

Acoustic Stimulation↗